Look at what the Cubans say:
Cuba, for example, insists its rights record is good
So putting political opponents away for 20 years is something which falls into the 'good' catagory? No wonder they choose Libya to head this debating club.
To: Tom Jefferson; backhoe; Militiaman7; BARLF; timestax; imintrouble; cake_crumb; Brad's Gramma; ...
``Countries with a terrible human rights record now command a large bloc of votes,'' said Joanna Weschler, the UN representative for the US-based group Human Rights Watch. ``You have a caucus that has one thing in common - a bad human rights record.''
No more UN for US-list
If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
To: knighthawk
Again the UN seems insistant on proving it's utter irrelevancy. Can they act any dumber? Is there anyone left, who is intellectually honest, who admires the UN for it's track record regarding it's stated purpose?
To: knighthawk
Many developing countries saidWhat's a developing country and how long does it take one to develop?Why not call them,"Countries controlled by Communist Dictators?"
Not PC,eh?
9 posted on
04/26/2003 11:11:21 AM PDT by
BARLF
To: knighthawk
The UN is as strong as Allah. There are no human rights violations in any country. If there were, and I know what I am talking about, the UN would crush them. This I can say with 100% authority. There is no horse trading politics in the UN, never. ALL LIES!! The UN will reign supreme.....forever! And I will return to prove it...IN ONE HOUR!!
Baghdad Bob
12 posted on
04/26/2003 12:04:01 PM PDT by
Chirodoc
To: knighthawk
duh bump
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson