[IC Ken]

I have yet to see or hear any evidence to convict. Also a body washed uo to shore last year of a pregnant women also beheaded. Very similiar. The media has him convicted in American opinion.

[runningbear]

ah, but isn't so nice to be here of public opinion, and with facts already brought forth?

Understanding you'd be one of the few the defense would love to have on the jury....

Thanks...

Oh, we, the people, the press won't know what the possible evidence is of this case until the Prelim May 19th, so until then, we just keep putting the pieces together of SP's charades...

[meadsjn]

I have yet to see or hear any evidence to convict.

And in what country does that matter now?

[RGSpincich]

Also a body washed uo to shore last year of a pregnant women also beheaded.

Yeah, SP probably heard about it long before we did. Possible he downloaded the particulars along with the bay's tidal action around Brooks Island. That would explain why he drove 80 miles to dump the bodies. Evelyn Hernandez and her then 4 yr. old son were missing since May 2002. She was found in July 2002. The child is still missing. It was widely publicized that, because of the decomposition of Evelyn's body in the Bay's waters, very little evidence exists to point to the killer. This article appeared in July 2002, about the time SP was slamming golf balls and wishing they were his in-laws.

[proud_2_B_texasgal]

><> I have yet to see or hear any evidence to convict. <><

Ah, but YOU don't have to see or hear the evidence. There will be 12 men and/or women who will get the see and hear it all. I think they have enough to be certain it's him. I think most reasonable people have heard enough to be certain its him.

We all could be wrong, but, geeeeeeeeeee, I DOUBT it.

[Jaded]

Good luck. Everyone (or almost everyone)who is aware of this story to any degree, was convinced in January if not December 28 that Scott did it. Trial by Media- the new wave. It just goes to show that some lives are more valuable than others.

[judgeandjury]

I have yet to see or hear any evidence to convict

I want to apologize on behalf of the Modesto police department for them not showing you all of the evidence that they have collected up to this point. I guess you'll have to wait for the trial just like the rest of us in order to see the evidence presented. Remember, patience is a virtue.

[Jael]

I don't think those cases are similar. That woman was having an affair with a married man who had already threatened her.

The condition of the bodies is common. The extremities go first on any body dumped in the Bay.

When Laci first went missing, and Scott called the police to report it, he wouldn't coperate even then.

When police asked to look around, he told them no and told them they had to have a warrant first.

Your wife is missing. You claim that you suspect foul play. Yet you refuse to let the police in the home to see if there was any evidence of foul play or any clues to where she might be.

No, he was acting guilty from day one.

[Devil_Anse]

Read up on the case, including the account of that other pregnant woman, and get back to us. It is obvious you haven't been following it as many of the posters here have.

[ladyinred]

Do you really think the DA or the police are going to tell us the evidence before the trial? Surely you must see how odd and suspect his behavior has been since Laci disappeared.
I am confident the DA has the evidence and it will be revealed in a court of law which is the proper place.