Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2004 Presidential Candidate Calls for Santorum to Resign Senate Post
Guardian Unlimited UK ^ | April 23, 2003 | wire report

Posted on 04/23/2003 11:45:44 AM PDT by ewing

Democratic Presidential candidate Howard Dean on Wednesday for Senator Rick Santorum to resign his leadership post after the lawmaker compared homosexuality to bigamy, polygamy, incest and adultery.

'Gay bashing is not a legitimate public policy discussion, it is immoral.

Rick Santorum's failure to recognize that attacking people because of who they are is morally wrong makes him unfit for a leadership position in the United States Senate.'

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Pennsylvania; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: candidate; dean; homosexualagenda; resignation; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last
To: JohnnyZ
Ol eaglebeak did a pretty good job hanging around FR for a liberal. But I guess Santorum made her (yep, turns it it was a her) pop a gasket and blow her cover. Sooner or later that happens to libs here - they just can take it any more and have to burst out in a display of raw emotionalism.
101 posted on 04/23/2003 1:09:37 PM PDT by dirtboy (Tagline under construction, fines doubled for speeding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
What'd they do that for? I mean sure, claiming Dean is more conservative than most Freepers is a crime against reality...
102 posted on 04/23/2003 1:09:44 PM PDT by m1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: eaglebeak
beak, if you're still reading this, you realize a lot of us are laughing at this one, don't you?
103 posted on 04/23/2003 1:11:29 PM PDT by RichInOC (...see, this is exactly why you shouldn't get high before you post...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: m1911
He attacked Rush on another thread.

That's an automatic DQ.

104 posted on 04/23/2003 1:12:19 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Fritz Hollings is Foghorn Leghorn? Then who's Henry Hawk?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: eaglebeak
Oh, but it is.

I don't want all stigma removed from every sex act.

That will leave the door open for Federal and State tax money to go for sex education to elementary students. How would you feel if all such sex acts were taught to your children? And don't tell me it won't, because there will not be a legal recourse to stop it.

Grow up.
105 posted on 04/23/2003 1:14:08 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
I already did. It's located above.

It's not so hard to grasp.

Taking my comments out of context is no better than what Lara Jordan did to Rick Santorum.
106 posted on 04/23/2003 1:15:20 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: chachacha
There is no connection between the Lott/Santorum remarks, no matter what your stand on protected class may be.

Focusing on the matter at hand.
107 posted on 04/23/2003 1:17:24 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Why is Dean so squeamish about discussing this "stuff" as he calls it?
108 posted on 04/23/2003 1:18:26 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Once again, you have nothing but slurs and invective. "Above" - identify where you addressed this issue 'above' - you didn't. You took an indefensible position and you've been running ever since. Because you don't want to admit that you believe it is wrong for gays and okay for heterosexuals, and you know you can't support that position legally. End of story.
109 posted on 04/23/2003 1:19:12 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Can you say (troll) good poster?

snicker snicker
110 posted on 04/23/2003 1:20:31 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Why is Dean so squeamish about discussing this "stuff" as he calls it?

He had no problem signing a law in Vermont for gay marriage. So I would guess that he is being a political opportunist, and, now that the war is over, he's desperate for some face time as people resume ignoring him.

111 posted on 04/23/2003 1:20:51 PM PDT by dirtboy (Tagline under construction, fines doubled for speeding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
They're not very original, are they?
112 posted on 04/23/2003 1:21:54 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; All
I'm new here.

Please please guide me to liberal trolls before I waste valuable debate and talking points on them.

I don't ask for much. Really. But a little Big Brother/Big Sister would help out so much and save me time and energy.
113 posted on 04/23/2003 1:22:34 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Then you have to throw out abortion.

The privacy rights issue was created for abortion and this is the test of the sodomy law.

All points back to Hillary.
114 posted on 04/23/2003 1:23:59 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Please please guide me to liberal trolls before I waste valuable debate and talking points on them.

Hey, that troll was here for almost three year before anyone noticed her. Some are better at lying low than others. I guess Santorum's comments were just too much for her liberal mindset.

115 posted on 04/23/2003 1:24:11 PM PDT by dirtboy (Tagline under construction, fines doubled for speeding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
You are new here? That hasn't stopped you from making fun of other posters' "member since" dates, has it?

Oh, you are looking for liberal posters? Like maybe those who don't believe laws should be applied equally to all Americans?

Here's a mirror for ya.

116 posted on 04/23/2003 1:24:59 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; Howlin
snicker snicker snicker

You said "blow"

snicker snicker snicerk
117 posted on 04/23/2003 1:25:29 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: eaglebeak
Screw you.

I'm a Militant Christian.
118 posted on 04/23/2003 1:26:39 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Could you please post something that makes sense? How in the world does the legality of laws passed into existence before Hillary was even born "all go back to Hillary?"

And could you explain how striking a sodomy law requires outlawing abortion?

What am I saying? Of course you can't. You're just pulling this stuff out of your butt.

119 posted on 04/23/2003 1:28:18 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Oh no! Eaglebeak has been banned or suspended! That's so sad!

Bummer .. that Dean comment was the best laugh I had all day

120 posted on 04/23/2003 1:28:52 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson