To: Outraged At FLA
The sweet smell of success? Not having to inhale someone else's filthy addiction!
5 posted on
04/22/2003 2:16:27 PM PDT by
Dr. Luv
To: Dr. Luv
If you don't like cigarette smoke, don't go to bars and eat joints that allow smoking.
If you do not like what others are doing, go else where. Why pass laws because you are a puss?
11 posted on
04/22/2003 2:32:02 PM PDT by
sit-rep
To: Dr. Luv
"The sweet smell of success? Not having to inhale someone else's filthy addiction!"
If I run into you on the street and you have B.O. and smell, remind me to have you banned from going out in public during daylight hours also. That's a comment worthy of DU. Do you contribute there frequently also comrade?
13 posted on
04/22/2003 2:33:26 PM PDT by
Beck_isright
("We created underarm deodorant, and the French turned that down too."-Mitch Daniels, Budget Director)
To: Dr. Luv
"The sweet smell of success? Not having to inhale someone else's filthy addiction!"
I plan to open a theme restaurant (using my own capital, on my own property.) We will serve beans and other gas-causing food, and celebrate all the ensuing farting, which will be supplemented with images, sounds and smells in accordance with the theme. The restrooms will have microphones to broadcast the special effects, and the stalls will have picture wondows overlooking the dining room. Disgusted?
Don't want to work in such an environment? Don't apply!
Don't want to eat in such an environment? Don't come!
Your personal tastes and preferences are not cause to deny my fundamental property rights and freedom of association, nor those of my (relatively few) potential customers.
18 posted on
04/22/2003 2:42:50 PM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
("Democracy, whiskey! And sexy!")
To: Dr. Luv
I doubt if the bar owners will win as long as the junk science about the dangers of second hand smoke still stands.
The root of the problem is dishonest lawmakers. People that compile junk science into reports to give to lawmakers are also dishonest.
22 posted on
04/22/2003 3:07:16 PM PDT by
Zon
To: Dr. Luv
The sweet smell of success? Not having to inhale someone else's filthy addiction!And being able get the government to impose your wishes on someone else's business as it pretains to a LEGAL product...............rather totalitarian don't cha' think????????
25 posted on
04/22/2003 3:17:10 PM PDT by
GaConfed
To: Dr. Luv
The sweet smell of success? Not having to inhale someone else's filthy addiction! Let me guess. Yow have always disliked the smell of tobacco smoke but were unable to do anything about it because you produced bad smells yourself, albeit out of the other end. Now, thanks to junk science, you can impose you own dislikes, opinions and tastes on others by law.
What a comfort that must be, until, of course, the expanding nanny state gets around to one of your habits. Ah, we'll hear the bitchin' then, wont' we?
When, not if, when that happens just remember your comment on this thread on this forum and suck it up.
28 posted on
04/22/2003 3:38:52 PM PDT by
William Terrell
(People can exist without government but government can't exist without people.)
To: Dr. Luv
When were you ever forced to inhale?
To: Dr. Luv; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; ...
Not having to inhale someone else's filthy addiction! I bet YOU have some habits that WE would find disgusting!
47 posted on
04/23/2003 7:09:42 AM PDT by
SheLion
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson