Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalHope
I don't see how it can be contained to just China, either.

Judging from the *low* rates of infection here - I'd say the truly civilized, industrialized cities where sanitary practices actually exist stand a far better chance.

Reading the history of a cholera epidemic starting in New York in about 1832/1833 (as originally brought over from the Europe) gives some insight ...

86 posted on 04/22/2003 10:36:51 AM PDT by _Jim (z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: _Jim
Judging from the *low* rates of infection here - I'd say the truly civilized, industrialized cities where sanitary practices actually exist stand a far better chance.

Singapore and Toronto both have excellent sanitary practices. If it can be contained in these two cities, then I would say western nations have an excellent shot at containment as long as the number of new incoming cases is kept low.

The problem comes when/if SARS breaks out in the slums of the world's mega cities. We have one next door: Mexico City. If the medical system in Mexico City is overwhelmed, what happens next?

91 posted on 04/22/2003 10:46:00 AM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: _Jim
I have a question. We have people all over the country with TB. TB is a highly infectous bacteria that is spread through coughing, sneezing, etc. Yet we don't see exponential case numbers of TB?

Is this just more contagious than TB? Why do healthcare workers not contract TB they way they are this virus? I'd be interested in your view comparing the two situations.

92 posted on 04/22/2003 10:46:35 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson