1) If we and everything in existence are the products of a random, meaningless process, then why are only sexual taboos undermined? Why do liberals like Mr. Trudeau so hopped up about opression, injustice, a global society, etc.? How does one infer from randomness some sort of moral imperative concerning these issues or any issues? Where does the crusading spirit of these advocates of ultimate meaningless come from? I will consider the possibility of their assertion when they begin to live by it and drop all their ideals, ideologies, causes, crusades, etc. and actually live as if their lives were as pointless as they claim to believe they are.
2) If George W. Bush has a moral obligation to accept evolution (which comes from where???), then why does Mr. Trudeau oppose Darwinism when it threatens to displace the traditions of, 'ow you say, indigenous pipples? When these people enter the picture suddenly the Sacred Truth of Evolution becomes the poisonous doctrine of a Dead White European Male and must never be permitted to sully the absolute purity of "indigenous" belief. Why does Mr. Trudeau oppose the teaching of evolution on Indian reservations or to Australian aborigines? For that matter, I once saw an "Afrocentric" Bible complete with essays by prominent Black Americans (including Jesse Jackson) that invoked the Biblical narrative to discredit racism and show that all mankind are literally related through Adam and Eve. Do you suppose Mr. Trudeau would ridicule these Fundamentalists? In fact, if Mr. Trudeau only advocates a "limited" truth to evolution (true for "rednecks" but not for Blacks or "indigenous pipples"), then perhaps he doesn't really believe in its "absolute truth" himself?
Say what?
This demonstrates a great misunderstanding of evolution.
Just because evolutionary processes are demonstrably at work now, and for millions of years in the past, and are capable of producing new species, etc., that hardly implies that one must necessarily believe that every instance of competition among populations is "good" and not to be interfered with.
Evolution is a natural process. As such, it can at times be as beneficial as a spring rain on the crops, or as pitiless as a hurricane.
Belief in the process of evolution is no different from a belief in the process of erosion, lightning formation, or gravity. That hardly requires us to approve and/or look the other way when the results are contrary to human compassion or concerns. Erosion is a natural process, but I'm not going to allow a landslide to happen and bury a town. Gravity is a natural process, but I'm not going to let a child fall off a cliff.
Famine is a natural way that populations tend to limit themselves to more sustainable levels, but that doesn't mean we should allow them to take their course.
Please try to think things through a bit more.