To a creationist, there is no circle, only dots.
Only to those who wish to cover their eyes and sing, "la la la I can't hear you". To those willing to examine the evidence, however, they prove quite a bit.
You can see people with numerous different head shapes today, they are all human nevertheless.
Yawn. And yet, no one, anywhere today, has skulls like most of those in the photo. Conversely, no modern-type skull has ever been found anywhere prior to a few hundred thousand years ago.
To show that one evolved from another you would have to date with certainty each and every one of those skulls. Most of them cannot be dated.
Sorry, but you're quite mistaken.
To show that one evolved with certainty from another, you would have to have the rest of the skeleton to see more features.
Again, you are quite mistaken.
To show that one evolved from another you would have to know how the internal organs developed on those skulls.
Again, quite mistaken. This is getting to be quite a habit for you, isn't it?
To prove the gradual evolution of one from another you would need the DNA of those organisms.
Wrong again.
You cannot get DNA from fossils except in very, very exceptional circumstances.
It's not *that* rare. And the times that DNA has been recovered, it supports the evolutionary view.
In short, the skulls prove nothing at all.
Finish this sentence: "There are none so blind..."
To a creationist, there is no circle, only dots.