Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon
Next you'll be touting "evidence" that there are little green men on the moon.

Truly, you grieve God by failing to use your God given brain.

Something does not come out of nothing as evolutions wish so desperately to believe. Faulty dating systems don't add substance to your wild claims either.

Of course you don't wish to admit that your premise is that this is all there is hence, no role for the Judeo Christian God. According to you, He just couldn't get His act together. He needed millions and millions of years, or is it billions now to create an ape. The odds of that happening defy common sense alone. The human body did not evolve by chance. It is incredibily sophisticated and egotistical doctors still don't understand its complexity. Yet, you wish to believe all this popycock because it suits your atheist outlook.

400 posted on 04/25/2003 9:54:12 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: nmh
Next you'll be touting "evidence" that there are little green men on the moon.

Where did *that* come from? Oh, right, I mentioned checking the evidence, so you have to desperately discredit such wild notions as doing reality checks from time to time.

No, sorry, I'm not going to be touting any "evidence" that there are "little green men", I prefer to stick to what's real, and the actual evidence.

And that just gives you fits, doesn't it?

Truly, you grieve God by failing to use your God given brain.

I'm sure God will get over it. *You* seem to be the one most bent out of shape.

Something does not come out of nothing as evolutions wish so desperately to believe.

Your poor grasp of evolution is quite clear -- no "evolutions [sic]" claim that "something came out of nothing". Perhaps *you* might want to "use your God given brain" one of these days and hit the library before you make another attempt at critiquing something you know so little about.

Faulty dating systems don't add substance to your wild claims either.

What "faulty dating systems" would those be? Be specific and show your work.

Oh, right, the ones that produce evidence that contradicts some of your beliefs. "If the facts don't fit the theory, they must be disposed of", right?

How willing you are to declare the Bible vindicated in every respect when archaeologists uncover an ancient city mentioned in the Bible, and yet how quickly you reject any findings, no matter how well verified, which appear to contradict one of your pet beliefs.

That's not very... honest, is it? By accepting/rejecting evidence based solely on whether or not it supports what you want to believe, then "Truly, you grieve God by failing to use your God given brain."

Now would be a great time for you to explain exactly why, for example, an isochron dating system could produce what you claim is a "faulty" date if the isochron indicates consistency? I'll wait.

Also explain how these "faulty" dating methods produce "good" dates for countless objects of *known* age (including many biblical artifacts) and yet "suddenly" produce "faulty" dates when the object being dated might happen to contradict the claim of a creationist?

Of course you don't wish to admit that your premise is that this is all there is hence, no role for the Judeo Christian God.

Since that *isn't* my premise, then no, I'm not going to "admit" that it is. I'm no liar. I must again repeat something I said to you earlier:

Look, son, *you're* the one with enough "vanity and ego" to think that you have me all figured out, when you've managed to be wrong on every guess so far.

According to you, He just couldn't get His act together.

No, actually, that's not anything I've ever said or subscribed to. Yet again for your edification:

Look, son, *you're* the one with enough "vanity and ego" to think that you have me all figured out, when you've managed to be wrong on every guess so far.
Hmm, looks like I'm going to have to hotkey that one real soon.

He needed millions and millions of years, or is it billions now to create an ape.

Apparently so, since the first apes appear a few billion years after the Earth itself did, and a few hundred million years after the first multicellular life. *I* don't presume to declare that it's because "God couldn't get his act together" -- that's *your* conclusion.

The odds of that happening defy common sense alone.

You forgot to show your math.

Yet, you wish to believe all this popycock because it suits your atheist outlook.

Ah, time to invoke the new hotkey, it's *such* a time-saver:

Look, son, *you're* the one with enough "vanity and ego" to think that you have me all figured out, when you've managed to be wrong on every guess so far.
I'll tell you this one more time -- stop trying to presume my motives and beliefs, you do such a poor job of it.
419 posted on 04/25/2003 6:28:37 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson