As far as I'm concerned, there's never been any doubt; but this time, they've proven it beyond any shadow of a doubt. NOW's entire defense of abortion is based on a woman's right to choose. Well, Laci Peterson did not choose to have an abortion. She chose to carry her baby to term and give birth to him, but that baby is dead because her husband killed her. So a woman's right to choose has absolutely nothing to do with this case.
A woman's right to choose has always been a false argument. If it were a viable argument, NOW wouldn't have to argue that a fetus isn't a human being. If a woman has the right to terminate her pregnancy, then whether or not a fetus is a person is beside the point. But NOW tries to justify a woman's right to choose based on the claim that a fetus isn't a person. So that's the core of their argument: NOT that a woman has the right to choose in and of itself, but that abortion isn't murder because a fetus isn't a person. So the matter of choice is secondary and irrelevant.
What NOW wants is abortion for its own sake, plain and simple, and they want it because it is infant sacrifice dedicated to their false goddess. They are simply practicing the same infant sacrifice that was practiced centuries ago by pagans. And they attempt to justify the concept by disguising it as a woman's right to choose. They've brainwashed many women by framing the issue as one of not allowing men to tell them what they can or cannot do. But by opposing the double murder charge against SP, they've revealed that their argument in favor of abortion has absolutely nothing to do with a woman's right to choose, because that so-called right is not involved in Connor's death at all. Laci chose to give him life, not to abort him, and her choice was negated when her husband murdered her.