Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Paul Atreides
Yea, Rather is the epitome of objective...
26 posted on
04/15/2003 2:40:16 PM PDT by
smith288
(Visit my gallery http://www.ejsmithweb.com/fr/hollywood/hollywood.php)
To: Paul Atreides
Rather doesn't like Rumsfeld's offense par terre!!
To: Paul Atreides
"I try to be an honest reporter, be an honest broker of information..."Bravo Sierra! My late Father was a PIO in Viet Nam in 1969. He tried to provide this pissant with stories about our troops helping the local Vietnamese and Rather refused them because they didn't portray the war in a negative slant. Dad accused him of being a Communist and he responded, "Maybe I am, Jack, but as long as I am bureau chief, the American People are only going to see this war the way I want them to see it!"
Rather, you are a lying sack of pond scum. You belong in one of Saddam's cells, getting the full treatment!
34 posted on
04/15/2003 2:44:59 PM PDT by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: Paul Atreides
"I try to be an honest reporter, be an honest broker of information."Try" is the key word here. "Failed" is the word that he omitted.
35 posted on
04/15/2003 2:45:29 PM PDT by
NRA2BFree
(REMEMBER TO PRAY FOR OUR TROOPS!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!!)
To: Paul Atreides
"...honest broker..."
GAG! HURL! SPEW!
'whited sepulcher' bump.
38 posted on
04/15/2003 2:48:03 PM PDT by
headsonpikes
(Help me decide: Is the Left morally corrupt and intellectually bankrupt, or vice versa?)
To: Paul Atreides
I try to be an honest reporter, be an honest broker of informationTry harder!
To: Paul Atreides
"I try to be an honest reporter, be an honest broker of information."
No you do not, Mr. Pants on Fire.
46 posted on
04/15/2003 3:03:07 PM PDT by
Bahbah
(Pray for our Troops)
To: Paul Atreides
Sigh......more Rather Blather.
To: Paul Atreides
How much blather would a Rather blather if a Rather could blab blather?
To: Paul Atreides
"he might have worded that at least in a somewhat different way," Rather complained " Other ways, Rumsfield could have said it...
- The press is making a mountain out of a molehill.
- 25,900,000 people are celebrating freedom, 100 are looting and the press focuses on the looting.
- The press is still focusing on the looting that occurred even now that the armed forces are patroling and preventing looting.
- The press doesn't know their head from their a--.
- The press needs to get their head out of their a-- and report on what is really happening.
- The press is so negative they make freedom sound like a bad thing.
- The press is so negative we could track troop movements by the electric charge of the embeds.
- How many of your staff did you let Saddam torture in order to get that propaganda to read on the air?
52 posted on
04/15/2003 3:24:25 PM PDT by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: Paul Atreides
You shouldn't say anything about dan blather.
He went to Sam Houston State University.
Of course it's name then was
S.am
H.ouston
I.nstitute of
T.echnology
To: Paul Atreides
"I try to be an honest reporter, be an honest broker of information."
Rather is so dishonest that he can't bring himself to utter a simple "I am an honest reporter." He would choke on the words.
Thus, he has to come out with this "honest broker of information" shit!
STFU, Rather. We got your number, already.
To: Paul Atreides
Rather-Biased should just give up on ever becoming Ed Morrow II, hook-up with Peter Arnett, and cruise around Old Europe on a Paparazzi Scooter-Built-For-Two, snooping around ritzy hotels, using state-of-the-art spycams to look for relational hanky-panky 'in situ' among visiting celebrities...
59 posted on
04/15/2003 4:27:18 PM PDT by
O Neill
(Beware the singer who dangs the brums of war...)
To: Paul Atreides
And we all know how honest and impartial Dan Rather is ... NOT!!!
60 posted on
04/15/2003 4:29:42 PM PDT by
nicmarlo
To: Paul Atreides
Somebody should ask Rather how they compare to the LA Rodney King Riots
61 posted on
04/15/2003 4:34:30 PM PDT by
uncbob
( building tomorrow)
To: Paul Atreides
Yea right Dan, CNN let us know what it takes to get a interview with Sadamn. Methinks you have blood on your hands too, what did you cover up?
62 posted on
04/15/2003 4:45:17 PM PDT by
Ursus arctos horribilis
("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
To: Paul Atreides
Hehehehe yea, this coming from a media _________. I'll take Rumsfeld any day over the presstitute that Rather is.
63 posted on
04/15/2003 5:24:55 PM PDT by
Maigrey
(Member of the Dose's Jesus Freaks, Purple Aes Sedai , Jack Straw Fan Club, and Gonzo News Service)
To: Paul Atreides
The only useful purpose that Dan Rather serves is to provide swabs from his nose for DNA analysis of the likes of Saddam Hussein.
66 posted on
04/15/2003 8:06:24 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: Paul Atreides
Just the title of the post brings a HUGE smile to my face.
To: Paul Atreides
Sniff...
69 posted on
04/15/2003 8:33:26 PM PDT by
<1/1,000,000th%
(Is Algore really preparing for a recount of the war in Iraq?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson