Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/15/2003 6:13:46 AM PDT by mollynme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mollynme
Let's start by banning all gun sales to African Americans and follow up with a co-bill to imprison all African Americans caught stealing or possessing a firearm. This is no more stupid than the NAACP's suit.
2 posted on 04/15/2003 6:18:55 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Saddam's Hiding In Tikrit He's Eating Another Daisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Keep Free Republic Rockin' 'Round The Clock!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 04/15/2003 6:20:02 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mollynme
What allot people don't know is that the KKK has joined this case as a friend of the court on the NAACP's side and no need to wonder why.
5 posted on 04/15/2003 6:32:22 AM PDT by Trueblackman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mollynme
The NAACP should go after the Teachers Unions with this same vigor. The education of young Blacks is much more benificial to Black society than the elimination of guns. Education would solve the gun problem.

I guess then that we would not have an excuse.

8 posted on 04/15/2003 6:48:58 AM PDT by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mollynme
'in other words, every African-American in the country'

The NAACP does not represent all African-Americans. Neither does Jesse or Al. Not all African Americans agree with want they do. But what can the average African-America do to stop them?
14 posted on 04/15/2003 7:43:47 AM PDT by tru_degenerate (that which is hidden will eventually come to light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

16 posted on 04/15/2003 7:51:54 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mollynme
Since the early sixties, federal courts have been acting as "super-legislatures," creating rights that aren't found in the Constitution and substituting their judgment for that of our elected representatives.

And this is exactly why the Democrats in the Senate (less than 50 "Americans") are attempting to control the lifetime appointments of federal judges (again, about 1,500 - 3,000 Americans).

The Left wants to control upwards of 300 million people with less than 2,000 people.

17 posted on 04/15/2003 8:48:12 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mollynme
GAWD!
The possibilities for abuse if this goes along are as limitless as is human stupidity.
20 posted on 04/15/2003 12:05:26 PM PDT by demosthenes the elder (If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mollynme; demosthenes the elder; FreeTheHostages
I seriously doubt that this will get very far. Of course, I'm drawing on "ConLaw 312" memories from ages ago. It seems to me that the Supreme Court overruled anything that took a particular segment of society and whose ruling would adversely impact that segment more than any other segment.

Maybe someone who has studied Constitutional Law more recently than I could enlighten me.

How about it, Free? :-)
21 posted on 04/15/2003 12:44:14 PM PDT by dansangel (America - love it, support it, or LEAVE IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mollynme
One word:

SHAKEDOWN!

23 posted on 04/15/2003 1:52:20 PM PDT by FierceDraka (Hang 'Em High!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mollynme
Among the risible claims the NAACP makes is that manufacturers have 'flooded the market' with firearms.

In other words, they have deliberately made the supply vastly greater than the demand.

Hmm.

I ought--therefore--to be able to buy a Glock for $10.

The gangsters, swimming in drug money, willingly purchase stolen or smuggled weapons for $7,000, guns I would lay out $700 for.

Flooded the market. If the judge has half a brain, he will toss it out based on this claim alone.

--Boris

25 posted on 04/15/2003 7:23:32 PM PDT by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson