1 posted on
04/15/2003 6:13:46 AM PDT by
mollynme
To: mollynme
Let's start by banning all gun sales to African Americans and follow up with a co-bill to imprison all African Americans caught stealing or possessing a firearm. This is no more stupid than the NAACP's suit.
2 posted on
04/15/2003 6:18:55 AM PDT by
Conspiracy Guy
(Saddam's Hiding In Tikrit He's Eating Another Daisy)
To: All
Keep Free Republic Rockin' 'Round The Clock!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
04/15/2003 6:20:02 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: mollynme
What allot people don't know is that the KKK has joined this case as a friend of the court on the NAACP's side and no need to wonder why.
To: mollynme
The NAACP should go after the Teachers Unions with this same vigor. The education of young Blacks is much more benificial to Black society than the elimination of guns. Education would solve the gun problem.
I guess then that we would not have an excuse.
8 posted on
04/15/2003 6:48:58 AM PDT by
BIGZ
To: mollynme
'in other words, every African-American in the country'
The NAACP does not represent all African-Americans. Neither does Jesse or Al. Not all African Americans agree with want they do. But what can the average African-America do to stop them?
14 posted on
04/15/2003 7:43:47 AM PDT by
tru_degenerate
(that which is hidden will eventually come to light)
To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative pingIf you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
16 posted on
04/15/2003 7:51:54 AM PDT by
mhking
To: mollynme
Since the early sixties, federal courts have been acting as "super-legislatures," creating rights that aren't found in the Constitution and substituting their judgment for that of our elected representatives. And this is exactly why the Democrats in the Senate (less than 50 "Americans") are attempting to control the lifetime appointments of federal judges (again, about 1,500 - 3,000 Americans).
The Left wants to control upwards of 300 million people with less than 2,000 people.
To: mollynme
GAWD!
The possibilities for abuse if this goes along are as limitless as is human stupidity.
20 posted on
04/15/2003 12:05:26 PM PDT by
demosthenes the elder
(If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
To: mollynme; demosthenes the elder; FreeTheHostages
I seriously doubt that this will get very far. Of course, I'm drawing on "ConLaw 312" memories from ages ago. It seems to me that the Supreme Court overruled anything that took a particular segment of society and whose ruling would adversely impact that segment more than any other segment.
Maybe someone who has studied Constitutional Law more recently than I could enlighten me.
How about it, Free? :-)
21 posted on
04/15/2003 12:44:14 PM PDT by
dansangel
(America - love it, support it, or LEAVE IT!)
To: mollynme
23 posted on
04/15/2003 1:52:20 PM PDT by
FierceDraka
(Hang 'Em High!)
To: mollynme
Among the risible claims the NAACP makes is that manufacturers have 'flooded the market' with firearms.
In other words, they have deliberately made the supply vastly greater than the demand.
Hmm.
I ought--therefore--to be able to buy a Glock for $10.
The gangsters, swimming in drug money, willingly purchase stolen or smuggled weapons for $7,000, guns I would lay out $700 for.
Flooded the market. If the judge has half a brain, he will toss it out based on this claim alone.
--Boris
25 posted on
04/15/2003 7:23:32 PM PDT by
boris
(Education is always painful; pain is always educational)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson