Skip to comments.
NASA picks landing sites for twin Martian rovers
SJ Mercury News ^
| 4/11/03
| AP - Pasadena
Posted on 04/11/2003 12:27:55 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:30:54 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
PASADENA, Calif (AP) - NASA unveiled the landing sites today where it hopes to land twin rovers on Mars next January to look for geological evidence that the Red Planet was once a warmer, wetter place hospitable to life.
Data gathered from NASA satellites orbiting the planet suggest both sites once abounded in water.
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: landingsites; mars; martianrovers; nasa; picks; space
To: *Space
To: All
PRETTY IN PINK
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
04/11/2003 12:30:49 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
4
posted on
04/11/2003 12:32:00 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi .. Support FRee Republic.. God Bless America, the coalition, and Our Troops and families)
To: NormsRevenge
Oh - I thought this was going to be about the Lee sisters - Sheila Jackson (D-TX), and Barbara (D-CA).
To: Inspectorette
6
posted on
04/11/2003 12:34:19 PM PDT
by
dead
To: dead
LOL! Maybe she can get a picture of the flag we left there!
7
posted on
04/11/2003 12:35:36 PM PDT
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: Libertarianize the GOP
BAH! Why are we still sending machines to the red planet? It's time to reclaim space and put Americans on Barsoom. It's time to make Mars our celestial beeyotch.
8
posted on
04/11/2003 12:37:39 PM PDT
by
GBTexan
To: GBTexan
Hell, we can't even muster the political will to go back to the moon, let alone go all the way to Mars.
9
posted on
04/11/2003 12:40:42 PM PDT
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: NormsRevenge
See that's just the proof the Left was seeking: today Iraq, tomorrow Mars. That's the kind of expansionist policies they warned us about.
Why can't we do what they tell us and be a regular third-world, socialist country?
10
posted on
04/11/2003 12:52:07 PM PDT
by
TopQuark
To: NormsRevenge
One Dems Congress Woman wants to know if they can drive over to where our boys planted the American Flag. /sarcasm
11
posted on
04/11/2003 12:54:49 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Semper Gumby - Always flexible)
To: dead
BWHAHAHAHA!!
To: NormsRevenge
The landing sites had to be at fairly low altitudes to provide enough atmosphere to fill the parachutes Yes, the landing sites ought to be at low altitudes -- preferably ground level since landing higher has proven to be a problem for NASA. And low latitudes will provide a denser atmosphere as well...
13
posted on
04/11/2003 1:09:09 PM PDT
by
aBootes
To: NormsRevenge
NASA picks landing sites for twin Martian rovers
Identical or Fraternal?
To: NormsRevenge
I don't think it wise to provoke our little grey friends anymore - they were quite specific the last time they 'took out' our probe to the Red Planet - what part of "Attempt No Landings Here" does NASA not understand?
15
posted on
04/11/2003 1:14:48 PM PDT
by
baclava
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson