To: Belial
You're such a good lapdog Nope just know the intent of good people, not hyperbolic banterings of people who get all hot and bothered by a New York Times article.
John Ashcroft is a defender of the 2nd amendment and always will be.
Phyliss Schaflley and the GOA can jump in the sack with the ACLU and the New York Times. The thing that tells me is that the old addage "opposites attract" is wrong.
This tells me that permanantly malcontnent and paranoid right wing groups(Phyliss Schafley and GOA) are attracted to permanantly malcontnent and paranoid leftwing groups such as the ACLU and New York Times in the common cause of paranoia.
76 posted on
04/09/2003 11:06:06 AM PDT by
Dane
To: Dane
Nope just know the intent of good people, not hyperbolic banterings of people who get all hot and bothered by a New York Times article. John Ashcroft is a defender of the 2nd amendment and always will be.
Dane, will another Janet Reno have these good intents and be defenders of the 2A? Why are you so willing to give future liberals such unrestricted power? I really don't get it.
81 posted on
04/09/2003 11:10:28 AM PDT by
jmc813
(The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
To: Dane
Nope just know the intent of good people, not hyperbolic banterings of people who get all hot and bothered by a New York Times article.
Dane, I hate to break it to you, but you don't really know Ashcroft, Bush or Cheney. Nor do you know any of the columnists who write for the Times. You have your beliefs about their "hearts" and intentions. And you are catholic in your beliefs. Take that into consideration.
Now weigh the actual text of the Patriot Act. Imagine another political regime in power. Consider the possibilities, when "good people" aren't running the government.
84 posted on
04/09/2003 11:10:50 AM PDT by
Belial
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson