Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmc813
With all due respect, I believe you are in a state of clinical denial. You have absolutely REFUSED to acknowledge the possibility of liberals being in charge in the future. I beg of you never to forget 1993-2001

And I think you are in denial of the character of the people who now run the government.

I haven't forgotten 1993-2001, character actually matters now, and people of good charcater are now running the War on Terrorism.

174 posted on 04/09/2003 12:21:09 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
I haven't forgotten 1993-2001, character actually matters now, and people of good charcater are now running the War on Terrorism.

Dane, with all due respect, isn't that rather short sighted?

177 posted on 04/09/2003 12:23:05 PM PDT by thepitts (The republic depends upon fervent devotion to all our fundamental rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
Are you suggesting that Democrats will never again control any part of government? That seems naive to me. They will someday have control, and the less tools we give them to abuse, the better.

We are supposed to be the ones in favor of limited government, aren't we?

180 posted on 04/09/2003 12:24:58 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: Dane; jmc813
And I think you are in denial of the character of the people who now run the government.

I haven't forgotten 1993-2001, character actually matters now, and people of good charcater are now running the War on Terrorism.

I'll say it again:

Dane - I've been watching your discussion regarding the Patriot Act and I will respond civilly. You are dead wrong. The entire premise of our government is one of limitation of power because power always corrupts. The document that sets up our govenrment is intended to restrict the lowest common denominator, the worst of the worst, should they get into office somehow. ANY legislation that is premised on lawful use of power by a good and benevolent head of state or congress (regardless of how good or benevolent, present or future) should never be made law.

Period.

Your position on this thread is not only un-supportable in a historical context, i.e. the time-period during which the Constitution was penned and ratified, it is just plain dangerous.

181 posted on 04/09/2003 12:25:58 PM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
And I think you are in denial of the character of the people who now run the government.

How so? I like Bush. I disagree with him plenty, but I do believe he is a man of character.

and people of good charcater are now running the War on Terrorism.

As I mentioned before, we are in agreement here. But I am realistic and realize that we WILL have people of bad character in charge sooner than later.

Remember Dane, there is a diference between "trusting" politicians you like, and "trusting" politicians in general.
187 posted on 04/09/2003 12:29:02 PM PDT by jmc813 (The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson