Blair's Simple Stubborness

The Washington Dispatch ^ | April 4, 2003 | Cathryn Crawford

[ValenB4]

I'm first in line. It's very fragrant.

How about the 12-year old dossier writen by grad student that Blair tried to peddle? Totally fraudulent.

[MHGinTN]

You haven't answered the question following your specious assertion regarding my President, little nettle.

[ValenB4]

Little nettle? The claim that Iraq had lots of WMD that they could deliver and threaten us. Not exactly true. The fact that Iraq has no links to al-Qaeda. Whatever happened to that document that the British Telegraph supposedly "found" in a bombed out building a few weeks ago that "prooved" the link? Why isn't that being promoted? Because there isn't one.

And that Salman Pak is a bunch of nonsense too. Intelligence pros are very wary of the words of defectors, who will say anything to get into America. So they went to Rumsfeld, who discarded the intelligence he didn't want to hear and made his own group. Imagine what historians are going to be saying about this useless war as the years increasingly go by.

You seem quite upset about this.

[MHGinTN]

I'm not upset at the truth (which you have tried to dissemble so that the facts don't matter simply because you've verbally denied them). You aren't worth acknowledging any further ... one delivery system is the terrorists trainees Saddam was supporting at the many camps around Iraq, including Salman Pak and in the North, deceitful little nettle.

[Cathryn Crawford]

Quick - start discussing pro-life issues!

You'd both agree with each other on those.

[ValenB4]

You aren't worth acknowledging any further

Good. I'm glad you feel that way. I hope that means I don't have to read any more of your nonsense. I concede defeat to your superior mind that can only come up with one puerile insult. Although it's nice to see you're progressing to adjectives - adding "deceitful" must have taken some effort. So what kind of books do you write? Pop-up books?

[Cathryn Crawford]

Check your FR mail.

[freedumb2003]

>>And ... FOX has on the ticker - Germany and France DEMANDING to have a part of the reconstruction of France. Amazing<<

As much as I would love to take you at your exact word and allow the reconstruction of France -- starting with soap, water and Trac-III's (especially designed for female legs and underarms), I assume you meant the reconstruction of Iraq.

Their DEMANDS are such pure entertainment I would not even THINK of stopping them. It is like watching a teenager demand HIS/HER rights.

Who is funnier: France (and her sister and new friend Germany) or the Democratic Party? Wow, toss-up and in either case great humor and entertainment for all intelligent individuals.