Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair's Simple Stubborness
The Washington Dispatch ^ | April 4, 2003 | Cathryn Crawford

Posted on 04/04/2003 5:46:24 PM PST by Cathryn Crawford

Blair’s Simple Stubbornness

Many people are asking, as this war enters it’s third week – where’s Tony Blair? He is gone from the televisions, replaced by the grainy night-vision images of troops and anti-aircraft fire. Now we carefully listen to Central Command briefings, instead of watching for Blair to set foot outside 10 Downing Street to assure us that Britain is still with us. He’s largely faded into the background, at least here in America.

Many people have wrongly compared Blair to Winston Churchill. Churchill was a man who suffered daily with his ‘black dog’, depression. He was a great wartime leader, always public and out front, but behind the scenes he fell victim to huffs and, at times, tantrums. However, he was a man who had the right temperament to lead a nation buckling under the weight of the blitzkrieg back from the edge of despair to victory.

Blair is of an altogether different temperament. He’s quieter, and, until about two years ago, seemed much, well, wimpier. He was a bit wishy-washy on domestic issues, and he wasn’t particularly outspoken on international ones. He was portrayed here in America as a sort of English Clinton, although with, perhaps, better family values.

Then came the day that changed the world. And, suddenly, he and every other world leader became our best friends. And by everybody, I mean everybody. Remember the press conference that Jacque Chirac had with Rudy Giuliani just a few days after 9/11? I remember quite clearly listening to Chirac’s voice, as it faded behind the interpreter, speaking French. Although my French is rudimentary, I could understand enough to hear him say that he and his country would stand by us through anything. You could see the tears on his face, real tears, as he expressed the sorrow and sympathy that he had for us. Cynic as I may be, at the time, it moved me. Now I think back and wonder how I could be such a sap.

Blair was not so emotional. He was simply quietly behind us. He pledged us any and all help that we needed, and he gave it to us when we asked for it.

Then came the next day that changed the world, September 12, 2002. On that day, President Bush stood before the U.N. General Assembly and told the world that the U.S. would not allow Saddam Hussein any more leeway to violate U.N. sanctions. And, lo and behold, when the other leaders who pledged us their undying love and support fell away, one man was still standing there, alone, but there – and that was Tony Blair.

He got heckled on the streets of London. His party split, some deciding to stay by the Prime Minister’s side, and some deciding to keep their hands out of the muck of war. His very administration split apart, and he endured public criticism every day from some of his former oldest and dearest friends. He was laughed at. He was jokingly referred to, both here and in the U.K., as Bush’s poodle. And still he stubbornly stood by us, refusing to cave to what must have been enormous pressure. He still said, in that quiet, passionate way of his, that Iraq was a threat, and that as the leader of a sovereign nation, it was his responsibility to the people of Britain to take care of it.

And, so, now that we are in the war that he did his best to avoid, yet never shrunk from, where is he? Is he hiding in fear of the media, as some say? I doubt it – it couldn’t get much worse than what he’s already been through.

He is doing what he has shown himself to be so proficient at in the last few years – taking care of business. He is not striving to make himself the hero of this war; on the contrary, he has given over that job to the generals running it. He hasn’t gone out of his way to be out front, flashing the victory sign and chomping on a cigar. Instead he is quietly sitting behind his desk, running Britain, reshaping his administration, and getting to all those domestic issues that have been simmering on the back burner for so many months. To put it simply - he is leading.

No matter whether you support this war or not, whether you like Bush and Blair or not, there is one thing that is simply unavoidable fact – Tony Blair is a man of his word. Like a marriage, for better or worse, in sickness or health, for richer or poorer – Blair has been by our side.

He has proven to the critics that he’s simple enough to believe in one truth, and stubborn enough to stick to his guns even when it hurts.

That’s what I call conviction.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: blair; iraqifreedom; thanksfriendblair
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: MHGinTN
I'm first in line. It's very fragrant.

How about the 12-year old dossier writen by grad student that Blair tried to peddle? Totally fraudulent.
41 posted on 06/05/2003 7:11:33 PM PDT by ValenB4 (Absence makes the fond grow harder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ValenB4
You haven't answered the question following your specious assertion regarding my President, little nettle.
42 posted on 06/05/2003 7:13:02 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Little nettle? The claim that Iraq had lots of WMD that they could deliver and threaten us. Not exactly true. The fact that Iraq has no links to al-Qaeda. Whatever happened to that document that the British Telegraph supposedly "found" in a bombed out building a few weeks ago that "prooved" the link? Why isn't that being promoted? Because there isn't one.

And that Salman Pak is a bunch of nonsense too. Intelligence pros are very wary of the words of defectors, who will say anything to get into America. So they went to Rumsfeld, who discarded the intelligence he didn't want to hear and made his own group. Imagine what historians are going to be saying about this useless war as the years increasingly go by.

You seem quite upset about this.
43 posted on 06/05/2003 7:21:09 PM PDT by ValenB4 (Absence makes the fond grow harder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ValenB4
I'm not upset at the truth (which you have tried to dissemble so that the facts don't matter simply because you've verbally denied them). You aren't worth acknowledging any further ... one delivery system is the terrorists trainees Saddam was supporting at the many camps around Iraq, including Salman Pak and in the North, deceitful little nettle.
44 posted on 06/05/2003 7:26:06 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ValenB4; MHGinTN
Quick - start discussing pro-life issues!

You'd both agree with each other on those.
45 posted on 06/05/2003 7:34:22 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford (Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
You aren't worth acknowledging any further

Good. I'm glad you feel that way. I hope that means I don't have to read any more of your nonsense. I concede defeat to your superior mind that can only come up with one puerile insult. Although it's nice to see you're progressing to adjectives - adding "deceitful" must have taken some effort. So what kind of books do you write? Pop-up books?

46 posted on 06/05/2003 7:34:52 PM PDT by ValenB4 (Absence makes the fond grow harder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ValenB4
Check your FR mail.
47 posted on 06/05/2003 7:36:12 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford (Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
>>And ... FOX has on the ticker - Germany and France DEMANDING to have a part of the reconstruction of France. Amazing<<

As much as I would love to take you at your exact word and allow the reconstruction of France -- starting with soap, water and Trac-III's (especially designed for female legs and underarms), I assume you meant the reconstruction of Iraq.

Their DEMANDS are such pure entertainment I would not even THINK of stopping them. It is like watching a teenager demand HIS/HER rights.

Who is funnier: France (and her sister and new friend Germany) or the Democratic Party? Wow, toss-up and in either case great humor and entertainment for all intelligent individuals.
48 posted on 06/05/2003 7:41:42 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson