Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jewish lawmakers threaten walk-out over reference to Jesus
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 3, 2003 | Diana Lynne

Posted on 04/03/2003 6:25:58 PM PST by honway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 861-872 next last
To: sauropod
Thanks.
For a good study of how his trial was conducted and he was railroaded, go HERE

regards,
djf
341 posted on 04/03/2003 8:28:48 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: yonif

Then why not just have the janitor deliver it? Or a Muslim? Or anybody at all?

What you're asking for is a speech, as the beliefs of Jews and Christians are completely exclusive.

I don't have a problem with respecting the opinions of Jews who happen to be present, but to ask the Christian to pray in something other than Christ's name is ridiculous.

That concession would be insulting to anyone with any, real religious values at all. It's better not to have the prayer in the first place if it requires dishonesty on the part of the minister.

342 posted on 04/03/2003 8:29:08 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (Frodo sleeps with men...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
You got it right. It usually takes someone who can see the forrest while the others are running into the same tree.

Always enjoy your comments. Keep the Faith.

343 posted on 04/03/2003 8:29:21 PM PST by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: mlmr
I would like to know why a person who believes in Christ should have to modify his prayer for jews or any one else.
If a jew or someone else offers a prayer is it allright fore me to be offended and cause trouble be cause they don't ask in Jesus name like I do? Why does God and Jesus always have to take the hit?
344 posted on 04/03/2003 8:29:25 PM PST by icu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Thanks, all is forgotten.

It is nice to finally understand each other.

As I said earlier, we have much more in common that what we have different. And we should work together against the Leftist --- whether from Jewish of Christian families --- to bring this nation back to its Christian roots.

Regards, TQ.

345 posted on 04/03/2003 8:30:16 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
This is a country founded on Judeo-Christain principles.
This is a country founded out of the Enlightenment, by Frreemasons and Secular Humanists who used Christianity just as Carl Marx, who was never original, later realized as a means of keeping the common people in their place. We did not have universal sufferage, and Christianity was never taken seriously by the upper class property owners that had the vote, except for a minority of New Englanders.

Hmmmm, Patrick Henry, George Washington, James Madison and even (probable Deist) Benjamin Franklin all seemed to take religion very seriously, giving it (at least) the utmost respect--all major founding fathers and none from New England. Jefferson's career was at risk when simply accused of being Deist (he wasn't....more accurately TJ can be called a proto-Unitarian) a charge he denied, by the way...

Of more than 50 elite founders, Jefferson and Franklin were the only ones close to being Deist...the rest, for the most part were regular church goers, many mentioning God (or "Providence") many times in their personal correspondance. The normal language of Jefferson and Washington, sound like that of someone deep within the "religious right" of today--which is why its so strange people, perhaps like yourself, are so distrustful and afraid of religious Christians today.

No one had ANY "sufferage" before the USA came along--as we were the first democractic republic since ancient Greece. The fact that it took a while for "universal sufferage" to be fully realized, doesn't tarnish the vision and ideals of our founders one iota...

You sound like you had too much of a dose of those unoriginal Marxist assumptions in your own education, in order to inaccurately portray the founders like that....

346 posted on 04/03/2003 8:30:53 PM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
I think you meant to ping me to #313, right? ;D





347 posted on 04/03/2003 8:31:04 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
You are right (this country IS a nation of religious freedom) - and wrong....
Read up on the founding of the nation and show me in the history books where the Jewish and Muslim founders are listed.
348 posted on 04/03/2003 8:31:16 PM PST by DED (Liberals Never Learn. *LNL*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JWinNC; TopQuark; yonif; Bobby777; Thinkin' Gal; DittoJed2; hellinahandcart
"A prayer designed for the audience is not a prayer."

THANK YOU!


349 posted on 04/03/2003 8:32:37 PM PST by sauropod (If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: DensaMensa
Patently false. As I said earlier, thousands upon thousand of Christian clerics find unifying prayers in a mixed company without betraying their respective religions.

You are not a standard-bearer. And certainly do not strike me as a logician.

350 posted on 04/03/2003 8:32:43 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Courier
By stating how I feel? Sorry, don't buy it.
351 posted on 04/03/2003 8:32:49 PM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: icu2
Why does God and Jesus always have to take the hit?

Ummm...Because Satan hates the name of Jesus?

352 posted on 04/03/2003 8:33:55 PM PST by Gasshog (eyes open, mouth too! tough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Make sure they are stale and hard as hockey pucks!
353 posted on 04/03/2003 8:35:21 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I am surprised to see you sticking up for the Jews, I guess what you hate worse are Christians.

Didn't you just write this today on another thread??

You might consider the distinction between "Israel" the people of the Lord (of whom I am one), and "Israel" the modern, secular state created by the United Nations in 1947
from your post at
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/882544/posts
354 posted on 04/03/2003 8:36:03 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Dittos mate!

By no means do i say that Jews are not Americans. They are most certainly welcome here.

Israel is the best ally we have at the moment (cept' maybe the Brits).

I think you are still not comprehending fully what I am trying to say, but no worries.

C U soon. 'Pod

355 posted on 04/03/2003 8:36:37 PM PST by sauropod (If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
"Religious expression is only politically correct for liberals"
You can criticize any religion you want to in this country as long as it's Christianity.
You can debase any religion you want to in this country as long as it's Christianity.
There would have been a much bigger uproar if someone was banned for mentioning Mohammed or Allah.
Virtually NOTHING that is publically said that is negative about Jesus Christ could be said about Mohammed without tremendous controversy.
This PC stuff is ridiculous.
356 posted on 04/03/2003 8:37:03 PM PST by DED (Liberals Never Learn. *LNL*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Edmund Burke
What do you mean by that?
357 posted on 04/03/2003 8:37:14 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: JWinNC
. A prayer designed for the audience is not a prayer.

This is cure but not true: an important word is implied but missing. A prayer designed solely for the audience is not a prayer.

A minister selecting and formulating a prayer for a particular occasion, although surrounded by his correligionists, designs a prayer.

Any corporate religious experience is collective, hence takes into account those present. A priest at a service for the youth of the congregation, selects and designs his prayers to make them effective for the appropriate age. He does not betray his religion, nor is he lacking deapth.

In every religion there is a personal element and behavior, and there are corporate experiences. Collective prayers are designed for the collective present.

As is said, cute but not true.

358 posted on 04/03/2003 8:38:35 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
And don't forget the Aussies - they've got 2000 troops in Iraq!
359 posted on 04/03/2003 8:38:47 PM PST by DED (Liberals Never Learn. *LNL*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Precisely.

BTW, we are having a "support the troops" rally in DC on 12 April.

'Pod dangles carrot: Ann Coulter will be there. < broad hint> ;-)

360 posted on 04/03/2003 8:39:04 PM PST by sauropod (If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 861-872 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson