Don't let those men and women down. Fill his mailbox full until his websight is down for technicial reasons.
1 posted on
03/27/2003 7:25:39 PM PST by
JohnD9207
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: JohnD9207
Lord, God,
This creature doesn't deserve to be called a man, or a human, much less an American.
Would you--please--be willing to facilitate his removal from public life as soon as practical and fitting with your other priorities? It would be a great help toward National sanity and the safety of Freedom.
In Your Son's Name, Amen.
154 posted on
03/27/2003 9:20:42 PM PST by
Quix
(QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
To: JohnD9207
This man is a piece of shit, Talk about being ashamed to be from a state your representative is from. I saw that interview we are to blame for the casualities he says, saying "Well their not shooting themselves". then he starts in with the racial thing and why blacks overwelmingly oppose this War. I think we Need an email Campaign to tell Rangel What we think of his BS opinions. EMAIL ANYONE??????????????
156 posted on
03/28/2003 3:27:23 AM PST by
repub32
To: JohnD9207
Is Rangel pro-America?
No.
He's a Democrat.
157 posted on
03/28/2003 4:25:58 AM PST by
Cindy
To: JohnD9207
Should any of you be shocked by the statements of Rangle, I mean come on he is a crazy ass old man who if not elected to Congress would be on a street corner selling homemade catch phrases for a nickle. I as a veteran myself am completely angered at the statement from Rangel that US Forces are out to bomb women and children when it is children who are shooting at our Marines and our Marines who are trying not to shoot back. I know Marines are suppose America's shock troops and quick strike warriors, but for any warrior who may have children it is kinda hard to shoot a child or woman. Rangel is a POS and when I hear statements like that it makes me anger and ready to run for Congress myself.
To: JohnD9207
I heard Rangel say this too! "Bush did not have enough experience" - (like Clinton did). To think this man would chair the House Ways and Means Committee if the Democrats took back the House is terrifying!!
Also Sean was on FIRE! He was JUST as angry as anytime I've ever seen him. Rangel started back pedaling BIG TIME!
161 posted on
03/28/2003 5:22:49 AM PST by
Alissa
To: JohnD9207
Charlie Rangel is a DISGRACE to his country
And I'm sure Jane Fonda is very proud of Charlie today
162 posted on
03/28/2003 5:28:16 AM PST by
Mo1
To: JohnD9207
RANGEL: Listen a part of my job in the Congress is to be involved in foreign affairs and to be involved in critiquing or supporting a president, and just because if I thought the war was wrong before he got involved in it, how in the world because he has moved forward with a preemptive strike against a country without the support of the U.N., wouldn't it be immoral of me to just change my mind?
HANNITY: Well, I would argue that it's not a preemptive strike. With all due respect, it's a resumption of the hostilities because he's failed to abide by his own ceasefire agreement and by the U.N. resolutions that have been passed, as we have chronicled, over a 12-year period of time.
RANGEL: Sean, we don't have a right to strike against a country.
HANNITY: Do you doubt the brutality of...
RANGEL: What do you mean it's not a preemptive strike?
HANNITY: Sure we do. Sure we do. We have the right to resume hostilities because he didn't abide by the ceasefire agreement nor the U.N. resolutions that were passed against him to disarm...
RANGEL: This country should not be at war.
HANNITY: ... and give up his weapons of mass destruction.
RANGEL: This country should not be at war unless we have a feeling that we're in eminent danger from whoever we're striking. So, a preemptive strike with me is good if there's an scintilla of evidence that we're endangered by that.
HANNITY: Why do we -- why would countries sign on to a ceasefire agreement if we have no intention of every enforcing it, because that's what you're asking us then to do.
RANGEL: Listen there could be a whole lot of things we should do when a country is corrupt and dishonest and they lie and they cheat and you don't trust them.
HANNITY: That's not my point.
RANGEL: But I'm saying I just don't believe that you bomb women and children in order to enforce something against a lying cheat, that's all.
HANNITY: Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute, Congressman. I'm not going to let you get away with that. We're not bombing innocent women and children. We are with pinpoint accuracy...
RANGEL: OK (UNINTELLIGIBLE). Sean, you're right.
HANNITY: ... we are doing everything possible to avoid it.
RANGEL: You're right, they're shooting themselves, you know. They just don't act -- they don't know they're being liberated so I made a mistake.
HANNITY: That's disgraceful.
169 posted on
03/28/2003 6:48:21 AM PST by
The Old Hoosier
(Since when have conservatives wanted to fight wars for the UN?)
To: JohnD9207
180 posted on
03/28/2003 8:57:57 AM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: JohnD9207
I freeped that embarrasment. I even put in a new york address so it goes to him as though I were one of his constituents.
To: JohnD9207
America doesn't bomb women and children. Period!
To: JohnD9207
May Rangel swallow his nose hairs and strangle.
191 posted on
03/28/2003 10:51:29 AM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
(If we possess the power to stop evil and shrink from our duty-we enable evil doers.)
To: JohnD9207
If Representative Conyers wants to impeach someone,he might start with Charles .
193 posted on
03/28/2003 11:04:12 AM PST by
jos65
To: JohnD9207; Mudboy Slim; Landru
Man, I am enraged bump!
200 posted on
03/28/2003 6:47:57 PM PST by
sultan88
(Embedded FReeper)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson