Don't let those men and women down. Fill his mailbox full until his websight is down for technicial reasons.
1 posted on
03/27/2003 7:25:39 PM PST by
JohnD9207
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: JohnD9207
How can this man dare say such things?
This is bordering on sedition, and he should not get away with this.
What freaking former President has the experience to lead us in war besides Eisenhower you moron? Surely you said the same about the draft dodger from your party right? Somehow I doubt it.
Communist!!!!
To: JohnD9207
HE SAID WE ARE BOMBING WOMEN AND CHILDREN.
I cannot believe he can get away with this.
In my view HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS OF SOLDIERS.
It is because of him and the peace protesters and liberal media that we have to bend over backwards and put our soldiers at increased risk to show the world we are not trying to harm civilians. He is aiding the enemy by portraying our military as baby killers from his position as a government representative.
I cannot believe what we've come to, and what these elected officials can get away with.
Sorry for the caps. I'm infuriated.
To: JohnD9207
I saw this tonight also and was totaly outraged. He was amazing in his disrespect for President Bush and our men and women in Iraq. He stated twice that we were killing innocent women and children in Iraq. I can not remember exacty how he said it because I was so totaly outraged with his entire appearance.
To: JohnD9207
This kind of tactic might work in his district, but it won't play the US public. When the war is over the Rangel plantation is going to be politicaly bankrupt and he knows it. Go ahead Charlie keep digging.
48 posted on
03/27/2003 7:45:36 PM PST by
oyez
(This country is too good for some people.....)
To: JohnD9207
Failure to remove this scum from a leadership position is a stain on the Democrat Party!
50 posted on
03/27/2003 7:45:57 PM PST by
F-117A
To: JohnD9207
That the soldiers fighting in Iraq were bombing Women and Children!!! When confronted with this he claimed that they weren't bombing themselves!!! And because of the accidental friendly fire incidence he could have said "the coalition soldiers fighting in Iraq are bombing each other" And when confronted with this claim that they weren't bombing themselves!!!
What a disingenuous bastard.
52 posted on
03/27/2003 7:46:39 PM PST by
Gumption
To: JohnD9207
I have heard rangel on many occassions with Hannity. I disliked him because of his support for Clinton. He usually provides a valid argument, but tonight it was way to obvious what he was doing and saying. He was blatantly lying and denying what was going on over there. He has been severely exposed, and our virtues should not allow this to go unnoticed. Hannity lost all respect for him tonight.
53 posted on
03/27/2003 7:46:41 PM PST by
grumple
To: JohnD9207
When asked why (as he had just asserted) his constituency fully supported his views about Iraq, he said something to the effect that "maybe they understand what it's like to be oppressed..." ????
Unbelievable. Usually he just seems like silly idiot. Tonight he got my blood boiling with his greasy sleaziness. I don't think I've ever seen Hannity quite as upset as he obviously was.
He came across as a coward that threw out politico cheap shots then hid behind his service and his elected position.
I certainly hope they quit giving him airtime.
54 posted on
03/27/2003 7:47:57 PM PST by
rpierce
To: JohnD9207
What I find great is that, increasingly, these evil leftists like Rangel are not being allowed to get away with it. I watched this tonight and you could tell that ol' Charlie wasn't happy to be challenged this way.
Sean did a great job of calling this old race hustler's bluff.
Bet he won't be back on this show for awhile.
55 posted on
03/27/2003 7:48:02 PM PST by
x1stcav
(HooAhh!)
To: JohnD9207
The new Democratic party...... shine the light on the scum and the Republican Party wins in a landslide. They soon start eating their own. It's a beautiful thing!
57 posted on
03/27/2003 7:49:58 PM PST by
Mark
(Treason doeth never prosper, for if it prosper, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON.)
To: JohnD9207
Someone needs to remind Chuck that he is a member of the US legislature, not Canada's.
60 posted on
03/27/2003 7:51:11 PM PST by
gcruse
(If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
To: JohnD9207
Charles Rangel is such a complete idiot that the state of New York should be embarassed to have them represent them. On the other hand, they're the people who were stupid enough to elect him.
The man is a walking cartoon - he belongs in the same company as Al Sharpton and Carol Moseley Braun; he should run for president. Then we could have a new movie - the Three Stooges Run for President.
Drop Carol, and you have a modern day Amos & Andy.
This is not intended to be racist - my point is that these people represent the absolute WORST of the black leadership. If 'their' people ever realize what they're doing to them, there'll be a lynching. It'll be over for Jesse, too.
Disagreeing is fine, but the democratic "leadership" only knows how to attack, and they're so hypocritical, it's shameful. They will criticize Pres. Bush for what's happening now, but refuse to accept any responsibility for allowing the situation to get where it is today - Clinton's actions in Somalia opened the door for bin Laden, and ignoring the threat he posed allowed him to accomplish 9-11.
And the only time Clinton paid any attention to Saddam Hussein was when he needed to divert attention from Monica's blue dress and the impeachment trial. Military leadership at the time said that the only thing that was accomplished by his 'attack'on Iraq was to spend a lot of money on missiles and kill a lot of people for absolutely nothing - no military objective was named or accomplished.
Rangel, Schumer, Daschle, Gephardt, Hillary - they're all FOOLS without a clue. For the two party system in this country to work, the Dems need to find some leadership badly - otherwise they provide no legitimate balance, and no actual ideas, only griping and moaning.
66 posted on
03/27/2003 7:53:32 PM PST by
DED
(LIBERALS NEVER LEARN. *LNL*)
To: JohnD9207; MeeknMing; sweetliberty; TheLion; Budge; Mudboy Slim
I saw this exchange; Hannity was furious; Rangel is a POS
67 posted on
03/27/2003 7:53:54 PM PST by
nicmarlo
To: JohnD9207
Why hasn't this treasonous SOB been tarred and feathered. How dare he, as a representative of OUR government, condemn our troops!!!
74 posted on
03/27/2003 7:56:26 PM PST by
sweetliberty
("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
To: JohnD9207
I saw it to, I'm DEEPLY, DEEPLY SADDEND SADDOMED. What a SOCIALIST, BUSH and TROOP HATER. GO W-W-W-W. Why did Sean that him say UNILATERALY?
79 posted on
03/27/2003 7:58:38 PM PST by
BobbyDJ
(qsteps)
To: JohnD9207
make no mistake, he is speaking for all democrats, they use charlie because he is a korean war vet, he is in a beyond safe district, and he is black--all characteristics that make him unable to be challenged.
grotesque!!
83 posted on
03/27/2003 7:59:05 PM PST by
faithincowboys
(God Bless Our Troops!)
To: JohnD9207
Wait...
I thought Rangel was a Vietnam vet....
Didn't they kill a whole lot more women and children over there?
Or is this another case of Democrat wars getting a pass?
(No, I'm not being an antipatriotic jerk. This is what I heard in school.)
85 posted on
03/27/2003 7:59:38 PM PST by
jude24
("Facts? You can use facts to prove anything that's even REMOTELY true!" - Homer Simpson)
To: JohnD9207
The gravel-voiced idiot said our troops were not being greeted with gratitude and Sean asked him if he had read a newspaper lately. (as if he would get any positive war news from what he probably reads in NY)
Maybe someone should email him some of the photos of the grateful Iraqis! ooooh, he made me so angry I had to hit the mute button.
86 posted on
03/27/2003 7:59:38 PM PST by
arasina
(PRAY for our troops, our president, our journalists, the POWs and the innocents!)
To: JohnD9207
I saw this dude on Hannity's show. He was absolutely disgusting. He is a disgrace. I could tell that sean wanted to knock his block off. Even Colmes was a bit miffed with him.
88 posted on
03/27/2003 7:59:54 PM PST by
kimchi lover
(When will the left learn that Bush is NOT the enemy?)
To: JohnD9207
What planet was Rangel born on? Why do I ask, for that matter? Just another jackass, just another topic (new FREEpers like myself need to be clear: A liberal Democrat is defined by Shotgun Willie immediately as a jackass, with further adjectives forthcoming)to demagogue.
Rangels, Rodhams, Daschles, Jennings, Rathers, Brokaws, et all, deserve to be painted with the same brush and treated in accordance with the same old New York Times pap and rabble that they deliver. Same ol' story, same ol' song and dance. Do any of these clowns have anything new?
FREEpers, unite! Keep up the good work, and reduce another jackass to the non-consequential mouth of lies he is.
There is no better way to rid our country of these FREAKS as there is to kick their sorry, self-centered asses out of office and back to the grind.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson