We are Neanderthals.
1 posted on
03/27/2003 3:07:42 PM PST by
blam
To: blam
French are cross between neanderthals and apes!
2 posted on
03/27/2003 3:10:50 PM PST by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(chIRAQ & sadDAM are bedfellows & clinton is a raping traitor!)
To: blam
Earlier evidence had suggested that our ancestors triumphed over their more primitive cousins because they were better at DIY. Psssst. They were better at SEX.
To: blam
I had a boyfriend some years ago that had hands like a Neanderthal!
4 posted on
03/27/2003 3:12:24 PM PST by
Mears
To: blam
As evidenced by Clinton's hairy palms
5 posted on
03/27/2003 3:12:42 PM PST by
amused
(Republicans for Sharpton!)
To: blam
Neanderthals 'had hands like ours'Yes! But could they pronate their wrists after hitting a lob wedge eighty yards under the overhanging branches of a weeping willow and land the ball less than six feet from the pin?....I don't think so.
8 posted on
03/27/2003 3:16:55 PM PST by
scouse
To: blam
Anyone who's read "Clan Of The Cave Bear" knows this ;)
To: blam
To: blam
"Neanderthals 'had hands like ours'"
This is true.
Many times on the Subway Neanderthals have given me a finger.
13 posted on
03/27/2003 3:23:49 PM PST by
APBaer
To: blam
Duh. I'm not surprised. I always thought the neanderthals were victims of "species-cide" by modern man.
To: blam
However, computer reconstructions of fossilised bones show their hands had almost the same manual dexterity as ours.
The idea of Neanderthals as slow-moving, dim-witted, hulking folk came from the study of the first skeletons which were of individuals who had suffered from arthritis; the specious 19th century view of evolution as being progress toward perfection didn't help matters either.
19 posted on
03/27/2003 3:55:18 PM PST by
aruanan
To: blam
It's more likely that their culture did them in. Neanderthals were slow to adopt new ideas and new technologies. This is evidenced by their stone tools. They stuck to the same tool designs for thousands of years. It wasn't until modern humans arrived that they started to toy with new designs. It's probably a fair guess that they didn't change other aspects of their culture either. This would have posed a problem if the environment changed too rapidly.
Rapid change could have resulted from the activities of the modern humans. In particular, the moderns probably used fire to alter the environment. Many hunter-gatherers burn off undesireable plants to allow more valuable plants to thrive. For example, here in Southern California, the Indians were all hunter-gatherers. They burned off the chapparel to allow sagebrush to grow. They then collected the sage seeds to grind into meal. This destroyed habitat for some animals and created it for others. Any species depending on the previous mix of game animals would suffer as a result of the change. Modern Humans changing the environment through fire in Europe and the Middle East would have affected the Neanderthals, but the Neanderthals were loathe to change their habits to adapt; even though they had the physical and intellectual ability to do so.
20 posted on
03/27/2003 4:21:52 PM PST by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: blam
"Bones, did you know that Neanderthals had hands like ours."
"What does it matter, they're dead, Jim."
23 posted on
03/27/2003 4:27:31 PM PST by
sonofatpatcher2
(Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
Not a ping, just a GGG update. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
25 posted on
01/16/2005 7:08:06 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on January 13, 2005)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson