Skip to comments.
More than Sodomy?
Salon Magazine ^
| Dana Berliner and Steve Simpson
Posted on 03/26/2003 9:28:34 AM PST by Stone Mountain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-169 next last
To: Michael.SF.
Homosexuals want to bring perversion mainstream, so we can be as Sodom, and if all are perverted, there will be no descrimination. I think of poor Lot in the Old Tesament, and I start feeling as he felt. 2 Peter 2
"4": For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;
"5": And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;
"6": And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;
"7": And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
"8": (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)
Yes, I feel "vexed" just hearing about it.
61
posted on
03/26/2003 10:39:59 AM PST
by
tessalu
To: Hermann the Cherusker
Why not sex with or between minors or with animals in private too? Nobody is being "harmed". These are covered by 'Statatory Rape' and 'Animal Cruelty' laws. This article concerns 'Consenting Adults'.
62
posted on
03/26/2003 10:42:31 AM PST
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: Michael.SF.
Count me as one conservative who believes that the government should NOT pass laws pertaining to restrictions on the private sexual behavior of two consenting adults. I couldn't say it any better.
To: Stone Mountain
Ill-conceived upon what basis? That private indulgence in immorality must be given every lattitude by the civil law? Is that not essentially what you are arguing?
The majority of us have chosen not to live in a world with prostitutes on every corner and controlled drugs in our pharmacies.
It has been the unbending tactic of our socialist anti-Christian enemies to subvert majority rule through the courts and bring about the total corruption of society hand-in-hand with their corrupted judges. You are joining in with this brigade that brought us abortion on demand, instruction in fisting in public school "Health Class", the forbidding of public displays of religion, and cruel and unusual leniency towards vicious criminals and deviates.
The men on Stone Mountain would not join you in this fight.
To: Orangedog
War on alcohol-Created organized crime...War on drugs-Drug use has never been high This is certainly news to all the Organized Crime gangs that existed prior to 1920. As to drug use never being higher - I doubt it. Can you provide some evidence of that?
To: Michael.SF.
Count me as one conservative who believes that the government should NOT pass laws pertaining to restrictions on the private sexual behavior of two consenting adults. OK, I'll void your vote, and bump ya 4 votes from my voting aged kids that feel the spread of this amoral dangerous deathstyle has had it's 15 minutes and 40 billion dollars already.
66
posted on
03/26/2003 10:50:34 AM PST
by
carlo3b
(I march for PEACE from liberalism.)
To: TightSqueeze
Children and animals are incapable of giving legal consent, as they lack the ability to make a rational legal choice. Adults on the other hand, have the ability to rationalize their decisions even if those decisions are in conflict with current law. Aparently their rationalizing is none to good, since reason is meant to be used to choose what is right, not to salve our conscience over engaging in crimes.
I can rationalize commiting bodily harm on those who support legalized immorality. Will you support my petition to the Supreme Court to allow it?
To: jmc813
That's why you need to have a society based on a common moral perspective first, and why multiculturalism is so much nonesense. Many of our new Muslim citizens see nothing wrong with polygamy and sex with children.
The wrecking of the common American moral perspective by liberals was done with definite cause and is an enormous crime for which they cannot be forgiven. The restoration, should it ever occur, will require the suspending of all mercy towards these people. The liberal choice - "live in a society full of immorality - just don't do it yourself if you object" is no choice at all really.
To: Jack Black
True. And look what happened to those Greeks and Romans and their Empires.
To: Stone Mountain
Just a thought: if the decide they can't regulate the private lives of consenting adults, couldn't the decision be used to support legalization of drugs? Same issues of potential private health risks to consenting adults that may contribute to secondary risks to society at large.
To: carlo3b
OK, I'll void your vote, and bump ya 4 votes from my voting aged kids that feel the spread of this amoral dangerous death style has had it's 15 minutes and 40 billion dollars already. Your fighting a losing battle if you think you can defeat this 'amoral dangerous death style' by passing laws to stop it.
You defeat it by educating your children on moral behavior and good common sense, as I believe I have. I am not advocating the behavior, I just feel this is something between God and Man and not between the Government and Man.
71
posted on
03/26/2003 11:06:16 AM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(A nod is as good as a wink, to a blind horse.)
To: TightSqueeze
No one has a "right" to engage in immorality, regardless of consent.
From what little book of law did you pick this one out of? Sounds like something from a certain little red book....
72
posted on
03/26/2003 11:13:03 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: Steve_Seattle
Just to give one illustration of my point: If a man and woman voluntarily commit adultery go driving
, and this adultery drive
leads to the breakup death
of one or more marriages of them
, there are numerous possible consequences for society. One or more of the abandoned bereaved
partners may go on welfare; there may be children who need foster care or who later develop behavioral problems stemming from the divorce death
that require medical or police intervention; there will be public court costs associated with the divorce accident
; publically-paid social workers may have to monitor treatment of the children and look after their welfare Really, you must try harder. This is too easy!
73
posted on
03/26/2003 11:20:18 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: steve-b
Nicely done. I was trying to figure out how imprisoning them would avoid the same set of repercussions.
74
posted on
03/26/2003 11:21:46 AM PST
by
Heyworth
To: tessalu
I think of poor Lot in the Old Tesament, and I start feeling as he felt. "Poor Lot in the Old Testament" is about as lousy an example of morals as one can get. He offered his daughters "who had not known men" to the men of Sodom "to do with as you wish".
I'd call him a scumbag, but that'd be several steps up.
75
posted on
03/26/2003 11:27:40 AM PST
by
jimt
To: Hermann the Cherusker
Can you give some examples of legislatively sanctioned acts of immorality? BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Have you been living in a cave next to Osama's bones?
How about the tax system (theft)? How about Waco (murder)? How about routine violations of the Constitution by public servants sworn to uphold it (bearing of false witness)?
76
posted on
03/26/2003 11:28:21 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: Hermann the Cherusker
That's why you need to have a society based on a common moral perspective first
How do you propose we arrive there? Outlawing the Democratic Party?
77
posted on
03/26/2003 11:30:23 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Control for smilers can't be bought;The solar garlic starts to rot;Was it for this my life I sought?)
To: jimt
Indeed. Even Clinton might draw the line at peddling Chelsea to save his own ass.
78
posted on
03/26/2003 11:32:32 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: Hermann the Cherusker
A bad ruling here also endangers laws in those areas, as well as for statutory rape and adultery.
Are you getting ahead of yourself? Is adultery illegal? Also, consenting adults are in question, not statutory behavior.
79
posted on
03/26/2003 11:39:16 AM PST
by
gcruse
(Democrats are the party of the Tooth Fairy.)
To: steve-b
if you want a break from the war, call your senators on Estrada or the tax cut...
Freepers, rather than waiting to see what happens with Estrada, we need to take the lead. That means presuring Senators, special interest groups, media organizations, etc. This thread is meant to be an ongoing effort to get this man confirmed. For too many years liberals have had their way on the courts. Now, President Bush is in a position to move the courts to the right. The election of '02 showed that the country is with the President. I think it's time to let Daschle, Hillary, and Pelosi know this is Bush country. Are you with me! Let's FREEP these people.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/847037/posts
80
posted on
03/26/2003 11:40:05 AM PST
by
votelife
(FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson