To: oursacredhonor
Well, at least its down from the 12,000 stated earlier today. Things are improving!
2 posted on
03/24/2003 7:38:02 PM PST by
Arkinsaw
To: Arkinsaw
that figure still sounds kinda high.
To: Arkinsaw
just nuke 'em.
4 posted on
03/24/2003 7:40:58 PM PST by
exsolus
To: Arkinsaw
Well, I am still going to stand on 2 Corinthians 10 vs 4 & 5 For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in god for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captitity to Christ.....Father, please send your angels ahead of our troops...We do not have to have 3,000 slain...Amen.
9 posted on
03/24/2003 7:43:52 PM PST by
LADYAK
To: Arkinsaw
Well, I am still going to stand on 2 Corinthians 10 vs 4 & 5 For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in god for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captitity to Christ.....Father, please send your angels ahead of our troops...We do not have to have 3,000 slain...Amen.
10 posted on
03/24/2003 7:44:13 PM PST by
LADYAK
To: Arkinsaw
he is being kind to Gen Franks. THere are a number of
analysts who are raising these questions.
Perhaps we can slow the pace down while we secure our supply lines, bomb the enemy lines,and get more troops.
sorry in advance if i sound like i have played too many video games.
Perhaps someone with more military experience can share their views. Please speak up!
12 posted on
03/24/2003 7:44:26 PM PST by
vp_cal
To: Arkinsaw
We take 3000 and they take 30000+ .. sounds reasonable to me.
15 posted on
03/24/2003 7:45:41 PM PST by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson