To: Fledermaus
Ive been wondering, why are our choppers so problematic? Seems they are the most common cause of accidents that ive heard of in our forces
To: ztiworoh
wind and sand maybe, we sent them in yesterday before real pounding to recon RG, it's a risk
4,478 posted on
03/24/2003 7:27:23 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Saddemocrats on the Run!)
To: ztiworoh
First - a helicopter goes against every rule of powered flight .. so any problem almost always results in Gravity taking over.
Second - rotating parts and Sand do not get along very well, and choppers tend to kick up a whole lot of sand landing and taking off.
4,481 posted on
03/24/2003 7:28:35 PM PST by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
To: ztiworoh
Choppers are very complex machines, and very unstable in flight. Many more life limited parts (limited by time in service) as compared to fixed wing aircraft. With the auto-stabilizer turned off, the chopper pilot's workload is HUGE.
Plus they fly very low, vulnerable to ground fire, and ground induced turbulence.
Helocopters seem to always be trying to come apart all on their own.
To: ztiworoh
The basic aerodynamics involved and skill to actually keep a helicopter aloft makes it more likely that problems arise.
4,502 posted on
03/24/2003 7:33:56 PM PST by
Socratic
(A little questioning couldn't hurt.)
To: ztiworoh
RE copters........... Is it because we need new ones & don't have them because 42 cut the budget?
4,503 posted on
03/24/2003 7:34:21 PM PST by
DollyCali
("Authenticity - to have arrived ! ")
To: ztiworoh
Especially the blackhawks.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson