Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chirac to resist control of postwar Iraq by US allies
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1045511980804&p=1012571727085 ^ | March 21, 2003 | George Parker, Krishna Guha and Judy Dempsey

Posted on 03/21/2003 4:18:44 PM PST by PresidentFelon

Chirac to resist control of postwar Iraq by US allies By George Parker, Krishna Guha and Judy Dempsey in Brussels Published: March 21 2003 22:21 | Last Updated: March 21 2003 22:21

Jacques Chirac, French president, on Friday ended the fragile truce at the European Union summit in Brussels with a strong attack on the "illegal" US-British attack on Iraq.

Mr Chirac signalled that France would campaign through the United Nations to keep any American or British involvement in the running of postwar Iraq to a minimum.

Just hours after Tony Blair, British prime minister, called for a new UN resolution on the reconstruction of Iraq, Mr Chirac said France would not accept a dominant US and British role in such efforts.

"France will not accept a resolution that would legitimise military intervention and give the US and British the powers of administration in Iraq," he said.

Mr Chirac, in his end-of-summit press conference, also toughened his rhetoric against the war allies, claiming their action "breached international legality".

His words reflect a French determination that having failed to stop the war, it will attempt to set the terms of the peace through the UN.

However, British officials played down the significance of Mr Chirac's rhetoric, insisting the French president was prepared to look beyond the crisis towards the postwar future of Iraq.

All 15 EU leaders agreed a communique on Friday calling for the UN to have "a central role" once the war ends, a view endorsed by the British prime minister.

British officials said Mr Chirac's words left "plenty of room for negotiation" over the precise roles for the UN, the US and other countries in administering Iraq.

Speaking in Brussels at his first press conference since the outbreak of war, Mr Blair said Britain and the US were discussing with each other and other EU states "exactly how that process takes place."

But he added: "There is a common view now, not just among the Europeans but with the US, that we have a new UN resolution that authorises, that governs, not merely the humanitarian situation but also the post- Saddam civil authority in Iraq."

Britain will "continue to press the case for further Security Council resolutions, first on the continuation of the oil-for-food programme . . . and secondly on the establishment of a post-Saddam administration".

Mr Blair's remarks are likely to cause consternation among those US hawks who do not want Iraq under UN administration.

Given the divisions over the war, Mr Blair said the summit communique on Iraq was "a good deal more positive than might have been expected".

Mr Chirac had earlier spoken privately to Mr Blair for 10 minutes, expressing his displeasure at recent attacks by British ministers on France.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.ft.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: chirac; chiraq; france; postwariraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Check this out. What bloody frigging nerve.
1 posted on 03/21/2003 4:18:44 PM PST by PresidentFelon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
Chirac and what army??????
2 posted on 03/21/2003 4:19:42 PM PST by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
huh...think france can take us on, I think not! Whose army would they use-the UN.

ROTFLMAO

3 posted on 03/21/2003 4:22:06 PM PST by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
Actually I'm with him on this. I think we should get out once the war's over. I'd be more than happy to let Chirac and his Euro club deal with the cleanup afterwards.
4 posted on 03/21/2003 4:22:11 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon
Yes, Mr. Chirac should remember an old US phrase: POSSESSION IS NINE-TENTHS OF THE LAW and the only law in Iraq is going to be set by two countries that don't owe France a thing: the US and UK.
5 posted on 03/21/2003 4:23:16 PM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
Chiraq drove his country down the dead end road of inaction and apeasment and now him and his beloved (soon to be defeated.) saddom will share inaction during during rebuilding.
6 posted on 03/21/2003 4:24:16 PM PST by ChadGore (No matter where you go, there you are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seeker41

7 posted on 03/21/2003 4:24:22 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Gulf War II: The Mother of All Surrenders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
ROTFLMAO!!!!
8 posted on 03/21/2003 4:25:44 PM PST by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
Now that the bread is baked all the lazy farm animals want to get a slice.

There is no end to the sheer arogance of the left.
9 posted on 03/21/2003 4:28:02 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
ROTFLMAOPIMP!!!!!!!!!
10 posted on 03/21/2003 4:28:42 PM PST by kstewskis ("Political correctness is intellectual terrorism"....Mel Gibson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
"France will not accept a resolution that would legitimise military intervention and give the US and British the powers of administration in Iraq,"...

Time to rub Chirac's nose in the smelly cheese and tell him that neither France nor the UN has any say in the matter. By force of arms, we have taken the powers of administration in Iraq.

To the victors go the spoils!

11 posted on 03/21/2003 4:28:56 PM PST by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
Check this out. What bloody frigging nerve.

You mean the same way he resisted this war we are fighting right now? Let him resist, I would buy a ticket to see President Bush's response to this one.*S*

12 posted on 03/21/2003 4:31:57 PM PST by RAWGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAWGUY
today Bahgdad tommorrow PARIS!!!!


sarcasm off
13 posted on 03/21/2003 4:33:31 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
We'll appear to "wimp out" on this one by choice. It's in our best interest - let's us focus our attention on North Korea.
14 posted on 03/21/2003 4:33:34 PM PST by PatriotNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
Here Chirac Kiss this
15 posted on 03/21/2003 4:34:29 PM PST by solo gringo (Always Ranting Always Rite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
This can't stand. The sniveling cowards won't fight, contribute nothing, don't support us, and now want a piece of peace?

France should be next!
16 posted on 03/21/2003 4:34:58 PM PST by Michael1550
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest
I have no brief against the UN being involved in the post Saddam administration of Iraq. OTOH, I don't think the Allies, or even the UN, should allow the irresponsible, self-aggrandizing likes of Chirac get away with the kind of threats and posturing that he's indulging in.
17 posted on 03/21/2003 4:35:49 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties
...to get away...
18 posted on 03/21/2003 4:36:29 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PatriotNow
Exactly how is it in our best interest to further support a corrupt French led UN abortion in post war Iraq. And what does France have to do with North Korea?
19 posted on 03/21/2003 4:39:00 PM PST by ffusco ("Essiri sempri la santu fora la chiesa.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: laconic
POSSESSION IS NINE-TENTHS OF THE LAW

Damn, you beat me to it. That was the first thought I had after reading the title of this thread.

20 posted on 03/21/2003 4:41:23 PM PST by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson