[justshe]

You need to pick a 'source' and stick with it.

You sourced this as Fox News in the thread title.

Then...at your #45 you state: "I got the heads up from a source in the news biz. We are juggling programming for the Presidential Speech."

Then...at your #55 you state: "I linked the article. I don't know if it was on Fox. I got this directly from a news network source."

Then...at your #64 you state: According to sources in Washington, D.C., President George W. Bush is tentatively scheduled to address the nation at 9 p.m. EST on March 19 (0200 GMT March 20). 57 posted on 03/19/2003 6:23 PM EST by ALS---relying on another poster.

Then...at your #79 you state: "FROM DRUDGE:
President Bush will be speak(ing) to the nation at 9pm ET..."

At times like this, imo:

People should be careful about their sources. I honestly can't tell what the source is --- based on the above.

AND........If this shouldn't be known yet, it shouldn't have been posted...period. Sorry...but that's my opinion.

This isn't some game to find out all we can before we should---or be the FIRST to post it. There could be very good reasons a heads-up should NOT be given.

[Amelia]

At times like this, imo:

People should be careful about their sources. I honestly can't tell what the source is --- based on the above.

AND........If this shouldn't be known yet, it shouldn't have been posted...period. Sorry...but that's my opinion.

This isn't some game to find out all we can before we should---or be the FIRST to post it. There could be very good reasons a heads-up should NOT be given.

I agree. Our soldiers' lives are too important.

[Hillary's Lovely Legs]

Here is another thread that you can complain on... Bush To Speak At 0200 GMT [9 EST, 6 PST]