Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve_Seattle
Is it bad that the Founding Fathers distrusted standing armies and entangling alliances?
25 posted on 03/19/2003 8:24:41 AM PST by Sid Rich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Sid Rich
It's not bad, it just doesn't work anymore. With faster than sound airplanes the world just got too damn fast to be sitting around with no army until somebody actually shoots at you. The Founding Fathers were absolutely right, but they're not anymore, it's too easy for a fast attack to be too devastating now. We need the standing army, and we need other countries on the enemies target list, preferably countries that are easier for the enemy to attack so they can be a buffer.
45 posted on 03/19/2003 8:58:20 AM PST by discostu (This tag intentionally left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Sid Rich
"Is it bad that the founding fathers distrusted standing armies and entangling alliances?"

I was just summarizing what I think are the main ideas of the Buchanan faction; I wasn't commenting one way or the other on whether I agreed with them.
74 posted on 03/19/2003 9:25:20 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson