Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia says war in Iraq a mistake and illegal
Reuters ^ | 3/17/03

Posted on 03/17/2003 11:54:09 AM PST by areafiftyone

(Combines comments by Putin, Ivanov)

By Viktor Korotayev

MOSCOW, March 17 (Reuters) - Russia called for last-minute attempts to solve the Iraq crisis peacefully on Monday, saying any resort to force would be both a mistake and illegal.

Russia has aligned itself with France and Germany in calling for further U.N. arms inspections to ensure that Iraq is free of what the United States says are illegal weapons. Like France, a fellow permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, it has threatened to veto any new resolution endorsing military action.

President Vladimir Putin, speaking before the United States and Britain said they would no longer seek a vote for a new resolution endorsing force, said any approach other than peaceful disarmament would be a mistake.

"We would like to resolve it through political and diplomatic means," he told reporters. "I am convinced that any other solution would be a mistake."

Putin, who has made infrequent statements at home on the crisis, said war "will not only bring about human casualties but also destabilise the international community in general.

"There are 20 million Muslims living in Russia. We cannot afford not to consider their opinion and we fully share their alarm," he added.

Both Washington and Britain say military action now against Iraq would be legal.

But Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov, speaking after the abandonment of Washington's bid to seek U.N. endorsement for war, said existing U.N. Security Council resolutions gave no one any legal right to launch a strike on Iraq.

"We believe the use of force against Iraq, especially with reference to previous resolutions of the U.N. Security Council, has no grounds, including legal grounds," Ivanov told reporters.

NO ENDORSEMENT FROM CURRENT RESOLUTION

Ivanov said resolution 1441 of last November, under which U.N. weapons inspections were resumed, gave no endorsement.

"Resolution 1441, to which so many references are made, does not give anyone the right to use force automatically," he said.

That resolution, approved unanimously, spoke of "serious consequences" if Iraq failed to comply with demands to disarm.

Ivanov said the resolution contained a clause obliging Security Council members, if necessary, to meet immediately to ensure Iraq's strict implementation of its terms.

There was still a chance, he said, for diplomacy to succeed.

The Foreign Ministry said no decision had been made on whether Ivanov would fly to New York to press an 11th hour case. France, Germany and Russia called at the weekend for a Tuesday meeting of ministers of Security Council members.

Georgy Mamedov, a deputy foreign minister, said Russia would do its best to minimise differences with Washington.

"Russia will not launch an anti-American campaign, but will try its utmost to return the situation to a proper legal basis," Mamedov was quoted as telling Itar-Tass news agency.

"We will not gloat over a tragic mistake by the United States or start a noisy campaign. Our relations are too important for international peace to hold them hostage to differences over the Iraq problem."


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: areafiftyone
The Russians have always been really fastidious about what is and isn't illegal under international law. </sarc>
21 posted on 03/17/2003 12:36:54 PM PST by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Since when did Russia care whether war was illegal or not? Cheez. Can't trust them. I like Putin but I'm not turning my back on him.
22 posted on 03/17/2003 12:38:23 PM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
has no grounds, including legal grounds

Makes more sense than the headline. There is a difference between illegal and no legal grounds. There is no law in these matters aside from treaties, and our own Constitution.

23 posted on 03/17/2003 12:38:46 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring; RCW2001; Askel5
Gorby bats 1000?

bump

24 posted on 03/17/2003 12:39:49 PM PST by flamefront (Take the oil money from the islamofascists! And not for the UN. Only UN-Americans ignore U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
America calls Russia's supplying weapons material, dual use tecnology, and NBC "technicians" to Iraq: BIG MISTAKE, ILLEGAL, and YOU'LL GET YOURS SOON ENOUGH PUTIN!
25 posted on 03/17/2003 12:44:51 PM PST by jt8d (An armed people are citizens... A dissarmed populace are slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Gee, I wonder if he considered the opinion of all those muslim Checnyans?
26 posted on 03/17/2003 12:47:11 PM PST by jt8d (An armed people are citizens... A dissarmed populace are slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
"There are 20 million Muslims living in Russia. We cannot afford not to consider their opinion and we fully share their alarm," he added.

But thety don't mind your war in Chechnya, right? The Russians can go to hell and keep the French company.

27 posted on 03/17/2003 12:51:09 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Tell us about Chechnya russkies.
28 posted on 03/17/2003 12:55:18 PM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchbert
good ... seems somebody remembers when Russia fired eight (8) SS-21 conventional-warhead missiles into Chechnya in October, 1999 ... gotta stop the Muslim revolt there ...

but they want the USA to ignore Muslims with WMD ... makes perfect sense ... [/sarcasm] ...

good post ...
29 posted on 03/17/2003 1:46:01 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
From Russia's 1997 Military Doctrine:

1.3. Basic destabilizing factors of the military-political situation:

diminished effectiveness of existing machinery for ensuring international security, above all the United Nations and OSCE;

the practice of applying military force in circumvention of generally recognized principles and rules of international law without UN Security Council sanction;

30 posted on 03/17/2003 5:34:57 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vooch
So, in your estimation, is the attack on Iraq just, or unjust as referenced to your comment on this thread:

Russian Military Doctrine (2000)

31 posted on 03/17/2003 5:39:28 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring; flamefront
Oooh ... good questions, Sawdring.

Flamefront ... given Kissinger's warning that we should not forget the betrayal of our allies, I'm wondering what exactly will be the nature of future relations with the former Soviets should they take a page from Hank. Should be interesting. Thanks for the flag.

32 posted on 03/20/2003 7:04:34 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
And the links ...
33 posted on 03/20/2003 7:05:01 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson