1 posted on
03/17/2003 6:42:50 AM PST by
harpu
To: harpu
If it starts, then Ashcroft should declare martial law.
To: harpu
TREAT THESE BASTARDS LIKE THE ENEMIES THEY ARE........TERRORISTS!!
To: harpu
McCarthism! /sarcasm bump
4 posted on
03/17/2003 6:45:31 AM PST by
cinFLA
To: harpu
Stock up on ammo.
To: harpu
I would think that some of these guys are headed for the clink.
To: harpu
The military security personnel at the various bases ought to paint a bullet on the side of their vehicles for every "peace activist" they kill.
7 posted on
03/17/2003 6:47:37 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: harpu
Memo to police:
HEAD SHOTS!!!
10 posted on
03/17/2003 6:49:38 AM PST by
nonliberal
(Taglines? We don't need no stinkin' taglines!)
To: harpu
Isn't Vandenburg in Charlton Heston country? I can't imagine that many of these bloc heads are going to get very far...
15 posted on
03/17/2003 6:59:41 AM PST by
Dutchgirl
(Don't run, you'll just die tired.)
To: harpu
"We'll be rallying in New York's Times Square at 5 p.m. that day "
Nice that they put the No work No School Rally AFTER normal work and school hours !
19 posted on
03/17/2003 7:17:00 AM PST by
RS
To: harpu
What they discuss is not "vandalism", it is sabotage. Shoot them as traitors aiding the enemy.
Actions such as these do not fall under the banner of "free speech".
23 posted on
03/17/2003 7:42:34 AM PST by
weegee
(McCarthy was right - Fight the Red Menace)
To: harpu
These people are mostly cowards. I doubt very many will do anything that might get them arrested. There might be a little disorder for a day or so, then those who don't get arrested will revert to mindless screeming. The only danger is that terrorists might exploit that day of disorder.
To: harpu
They need a smiting.
To: harpu
It's just a question of the cowards to lunatics ratio among the protesters. I suspect its about 100:1, and the cowards are not going to go over wire at Vandenberg.
I could see some very serious obstruction outside the gates though -- Santa Barbara County is increasingly liberal; the odds that the sheriff will crack down, or that judges and juries would impose significant punishment, aren't good.
To: harpu
We contend that property destruction is not a violent activity unless it destroys lives or causes pain in the process.If you try this destruction on my property, you will find yourself in a very violent activity!
27 posted on
03/17/2003 8:21:16 AM PST by
Gritty
To: harpu; viligantcitizen; Travis McGee
>>our main targets are the rich and powerful.
These dweebs need to buy a clue. Just based on assets, income, and my best guess on their criteria, our family probably falls into that category. I say, Bring it on, @#&holes! We're ready for you pukes. Just show up in the neighborhood threatening violence to the "rich and powerful".
GRRRRR. This stuff just pisses me off, and the fact that Leftie city governments in places like SF, Portland, and Seattle all but support it, really gets my blood boiling.
30 posted on
03/17/2003 8:30:28 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(This Space Intentionally Blank)
To: harpu
Ive done a bit of work around SAC bases. Believe me, you can have permits, clearances, etc. to be where you are, but still get jumped by guards and have twin .50s pointed at you until you are checked out. My bet is that the military installation guards will have shoot to kill orders during this war.
Im not about to worry my friends and relatives with this. Sure, there will be some rioting. But, after a few of these Bozos are shot, theyll fold like house of cards.
33 posted on
03/17/2003 8:49:35 AM PST by
Barnacle
(A Happy St. Patrick’s Day to You and Yours)
To: harpu
Some time on "The Working End of a Hoe" or makeing little ones out of big ones will open these closed minds.
37 posted on
03/17/2003 8:56:30 AM PST by
fella
To: harpu
This morning I printed this and brought it in the car to read in traffic. At lunch time I saw a car in a strip-mall with "NO WAR" and one of those .org peace group sites painted all over it. So I had to leave my copy under their wiper.
;-)
42 posted on
03/17/2003 4:30:43 PM PST by
StriperSniper
(Frogs are for gigging)
To: harpu; hchutch; dighton; general_re; Travis McGee; aculeus; BlueLancer
We contend that property destruction is not a violent activity unless it destroys lives or causes pain in the process. By this definition, private property--especially corporate private property--is itself infinitely more violent than any action taken against it.I f***ing well contend that slaughtering "Black bloc anarchists" engaged in property destruction is not a violent activity--merely an aerobic one. Try to destroy my property, and I'll make sure y'all get a date with the Turk. Bring it, baby. Just bring it.
VISUALIZE PEACENIK TRAITORS HANGING FROM LAMPPOSTS
43 posted on
03/17/2003 4:35:23 PM PST by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson