Skip to comments.
UN resolution to eject the United States from the United Nations
ArabicNews ^
| 3/15/2003
| abbadabba
Posted on 03/16/2003 6:55:44 PM PST by witnesstothefall
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-198 next last
To: witnesstothefall
To quote Hamlet, "'Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished." Wonder what those twits will do when they have to pay their own bills?
To: witnesstothefall
Oh no, this has got to be from the Onion. The dictators in the UN are pissed cause the didn't get their way, bring it on!!
142
posted on
03/16/2003 9:57:25 PM PST
by
Porterville
(Screw the grammar, full posting ahead.)
To: finnman69
When did it go down to 20%? I thought it had always been 25% or more.
vaudine
143
posted on
03/16/2003 10:12:43 PM PST
by
vaudine
To: witnesstothefall
This from a culture that believes if you kill someone for religious purposes you go to heaven
and get 72 virgins.
A culture that still sleeps in the dirt and in caves
144
posted on
03/16/2003 10:45:50 PM PST
by
Kay Soze
(France - "Where the worms live above ground")
To: fooman
I have been saying we need a united democracies too. Other nations could be gallery countries that watch, but are not allowed to vote.
This would create incentives for countries to become certified democracies.
What we should have a is a United Democracies where votes are counted on the formula of "population size" * "human rights" where human rights is on a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being just barely free enough to participate in the UD and 10 being almost perfectly free. The "human rights" category should be only the most basic and most important rights, like those found in the Constitution (except maybe the 2nd Amendment, I don't think we would penalize other countries for deciding differently on that matter). This way, we wouldn't have to suck up to tiny countries like Guinea for no good reason, and we wouldn't have to suck up to dictatorships like China. We wouldn't have to worry about France because they would be too sophisticated to join a coalition if their good friend Mugabe wasn't invited. Countries not meeting human rights standards would automatically have zero votes, because of their human rights score.
We would have to divide the number of votes by some huge number like 10M or 100M or America could conceivably have 3 billion votes in the UD (which would take a hell of a long time to hand count if Gore got snippy).
This would create a direct incentive for countries to democractize and grant basic rights to the citizens, even if they are relatively free countries (like the UK, for example, which would lose some votes over free speech issues). It would not have any affect on dictators like Mugabe, because he knows he's not even going to make the floor value to get into the UD, so there's no point in his trying to democractize. But I really can't see any other international system that would encourage him to make his country freer short of threatening to do to him what Bush is doing to Hussein right now.
145
posted on
03/16/2003 10:56:02 PM PST
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: witnesstothefall
It is time to kick the USA out of the UN Security Council for starters, or out of the United Nations if need be.
Oh, please don't throw us in that briar patch!
146
posted on
03/16/2003 10:57:24 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: Psalm118
Please, oh please, don't throw me into the briar-patch.
That was the first thing that came to my mind too. Yes, let the UN move to Paris. Let the French look on their hoarded treasures of artistically far more creative ages than the present, think about the planned Muslim takeover of Europe, and reflect on what happened to the ancient Buddhist statues of Afghanistan.
147
posted on
03/16/2003 11:07:10 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: witnesstothefall
Talk about a dream come true :)
148
posted on
03/16/2003 11:23:26 PM PST
by
ECM
To: witnesstothefall
Works for me.
149
posted on
03/16/2003 11:31:48 PM PST
by
altair
(We don't need the UN)
To: witnesstothefall
oh, please, please, brer fox, don' throw me in thet thar briar patch!
150
posted on
03/16/2003 11:34:44 PM PST
by
demosthenes the elder
(scum will never cease to be scum - why must that be explained to anyone?)
To: kaylar
drat, you beat me to it!
151
posted on
03/16/2003 11:35:14 PM PST
by
demosthenes the elder
(scum will never cease to be scum - why must that be explained to anyone?)
To: Sofa King
as opposed to what they do now?
152
posted on
03/16/2003 11:37:35 PM PST
by
demosthenes the elder
(scum will never cease to be scum - why must that be explained to anyone?)
To: Petronski
I don't know where THAT came from, but you owe me a new keyboard, dude.
153
posted on
03/16/2003 11:40:49 PM PST
by
demosthenes the elder
(scum will never cease to be scum - why must that be explained to anyone?)
To: witnesstothefall
We've been fired from the UN?
Where do we collect unemployment?
To: witnesstothefall
...The tactics the US is using are those of despots, and dictatorships...
LOL......This is so much fun !
Can the Arabic world show anything other than despots and dictators?
155
posted on
03/16/2003 11:47:20 PM PST
by
Mihalis
To: richace
Pyongyang, North Korea
Let em see the kind of places they support up close!
156
posted on
03/16/2003 11:48:42 PM PST
by
America's Resolve
("We have prepared for the unbelievers, whips and chains and blazing fires!" Koran 76:4)
To: witnesstothefall
Alright, tons of laughs and all that but what Freeper wrote this?
157
posted on
03/16/2003 11:49:05 PM PST
by
jwh_Denver
(What they need's a damn good wacking!)
To: witnesstothefall
Hmm. An opportunity to end our part of a hegemonic world 'democratic' government (held hostage by tyrannical/communist despots)...what a *GREAT* day it will be when the UN folds and is no longer acting against American sovereignty and security. This notion will be a great day.
However, the Word of God makes it clear that an international body will take control and dominate all of the world's people. If not the UN, something more advanced and dangerous.
Funny...those shouting in the desert about world government don't sound so 'kooky' anymore...
158
posted on
03/16/2003 11:55:04 PM PST
by
ApesForEvolution
(Why do business with gerdung firms?)
To: witnesstothefall
Hmmmmm?? I don't think these people want to give up our $900 million we pay each year so they can have their lunches and live like kings while people in their countries live in filth and poverty.
159
posted on
03/16/2003 11:58:26 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
( -> -> -> Oswego!!)
To: fooman
Democracy itself is not what America was founded upon and democracy itself does not make a nation great.
Remember: A PURE democracy is akin to 3 wolves and 1 sheep setting down to vote what's for dinner.
A pure international one world government democracy is *NOT* in the sovereign interests of America OR the world.
160
posted on
03/17/2003 12:14:45 AM PST
by
ApesForEvolution
(Why do business with gerdung firms?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-198 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson