Skip to comments.
NBC News: Regular Army in No. Iraq Already Beginning to Surrender; Little Food, Equipment Broken
NBC News
| March 16, 2003
| Fred Francis
Posted on 03/16/2003 3:57:05 PM PST by Timesink
Fred Francis reporting live as I type this from Iraq's Northern Front.
Many members of the Iraqi regular army are already coming across to surrender. They report no food. Morale near zero. Everyone from the highest commanders to the lowest privates that remain are openly discussing plans to surrender en masse the moment war starts.
One commander says he has 27 tanks; only 6 work.
Francis reports that US forces expect near-ZERO military response from Iraqi forces, except from the Republican Guard around Baghdad itself. The reason: They actually think they WON in 1991 because we didn't go after them. (Even though that was by UN fiat, not a military decision.) They will fight, unless they've been shocked and awed, heh heh heh.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: embeddedreport; fredfrancis; iraqissurrender; msdnc; msnbc; nbcnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-127 next last
To: Severa
10-4 on the UK Wildcats. A pleasant diversion from this sorry situation. We hope the war ends quickly with minimum losses on both sides (other than nail Saddam and all his "close" friends.) Let's get this operation under way - now!
61
posted on
03/16/2003 4:34:48 PM PST
by
toddst
Comment #62 Removed by Moderator
To: arichtaxpayer
I bet most of the soldiers aren't really excited to be there. It is pretty sad. I hope they have the brains to kill Saddam and Co. and save the whole country some heart ache.
To: POGIFFMOO
She's a weasel.
To: bart99
120K troops in three concentric rings around Baghdad plus the underground city caves.(with oil in the rivers to set fire at their leisure)
Id say about 4-5 MOAB's worth..
65
posted on
03/16/2003 4:42:28 PM PST
by
ewing
To: RoseofTexas
Last week it was only reported in the Mirror. I think NBC News is more credible.
66
posted on
03/16/2003 4:42:31 PM PST
by
areafiftyone
(The U.N. is now officially irrelevant! The building is for Sale!!!)
To: Timesink
Offsides. 10 yard penalty.
67
posted on
03/16/2003 4:42:37 PM PST
by
gitmo
("The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain." GWB)
To: SamAdams76
I think you verify if your hotel has Fox News on the Fox News website.
68
posted on
03/16/2003 4:43:25 PM PST
by
CMailBag
To: Steven W.
As discussed in another thread, he had execution squads last time too. They surrendered along with everyone else.
69
posted on
03/16/2003 4:45:35 PM PST
by
kms61
To: Timesink
Many members of the Iraqi regular army are already coming across to surrender. I see the French military training worked very well.
To: Timesink
Yeah....zee Chiraq wude lohve to fook zee US....
71
posted on
03/16/2003 4:57:49 PM PST
by
clintonh8r
(It is better to be feared than to be respected.)
To: RoseofTexas
Is this story the latest or the same story from last week? Last weeks story was about British troops in the south, at the Kuwait/Iraq border. It was probably true.
This latest report is from the north. It is probably true as well.
72
posted on
03/16/2003 5:09:11 PM PST
by
jackbill
To: Timesink
Bush stated today from the Azores that France (aka 'toilet truffles') "showed/played its cards (and the UN's as well)".
73
posted on
03/16/2003 5:16:56 PM PST
by
ApesForEvolution
(Why do business with gerdung firms?)
To: Timesink
let's hope they let these guys stay
74
posted on
03/16/2003 5:18:19 PM PST
by
The Wizard
(Demonrats are enemies of America)
To: PJ-Comix; Poohbah; colorado tanker
Guess word filtered down about 73 Easting...
Eagle Troop, 2nd ACR vs. the Tawakalna Division. H.R. McMaster took on the spearhead of the force that invaded Kuwait and kicked their ass.
75
posted on
03/16/2003 5:19:01 PM PST
by
hchutch
("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
To: Timesink
I continue to pray that saddam's regime will implode without us having to fire a shot.
76
posted on
03/16/2003 5:24:00 PM PST
by
mombonn
To: VRWC_minion
>>This is going to make things much more dangerous<<
Agree.
The guarantee of the territorial integrity of Iraq is a foolish overextension of the mission. I hope we don't mean it.
To: Timesink
Consistent with earlier reporting.
Saddam only sent the dregs of his army and equipment to the deserts. He knew they'd surrender first chance anyway, like they did in '91. He saved the food and the weapons and the effective troops for the defense of Baghdad itself.
To: wackyforwesties
It will be a regime change, and that is the goal!
79
posted on
03/16/2003 5:38:13 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: mombonn
I continue to pray that saddam's regime will implode without us having to fire a shot. Ok, ok, but can we drop just one MOAB?
80
posted on
03/16/2003 5:38:56 PM PST
by
bigdog
(eany,meany,miney,moe...look out now it's goin' to blow)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson