[Dolphy]

Tierney may be right, though he is also somewhat goofy. I think he went to Iraq in a support role, not as an actual inspector. Regardless, if I have Colin Powell telling me that the aluminum tubes are made to a higher grade than necessary for their reported use, and El Baradei saying something different, I will go with Powell. The IAEA has been wrong in Iraq before, behind in Iran and didn't seem to know what was up in North Korea.

[Green]

The IAEA has been wrong in Iraq before

That very thing was said this morning on the talk show I was watching (can't remember if it was Cheney or Powell - I was switching channels back and forth - I believe it was Cheney) - said with all due respect, the IAEA has been wrong many times before and they've said nothing to convince me that they are right this time.

[juzcuz]

I heard Tony Blair at one point telling other members of UN- Look we all know exactly what Saddam has... I took that to mean that they all know because they( UN members) sold it/them to him. It seems like Blix and Baradae were just there to shuffle papers back and forth. If Tierney is right- then the inpsectors were there to make sure reports did not include violations. Why? Is there a grand scheme by the UN to destroy America..... Where's my tin foil.... It'll turn up...

[juzcuz]

Tierney- Don't know about his credibility- the remote viewing stuff is wierd. Though there are LE's using info from psychics now days, that's wierd too...

http://www.etrend.ch/fundgrube/win_fundgrube/gt_tierney_nukes_iraq.htm. In this link he is described as a co-inspector with Scott Ritter and other postions... Anyway, see the letter he sent to Blix and Baradei at the bottom. Tierney thinks there is a nuke site underground.