Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spain links suspect in 9/11 plot to Baghdad
The Observer (U.K.) ^ | 03/16/03 | David Rose

Posted on 03/15/2003 5:08:26 PM PST by Pokey78

An alleged terrorist accused of helping the 11 September conspirators was invited to a party by the Iraqi ambassador to Spain under his al-Qaeda nom de guerre, according to documents seized by Spanish investigators.

Yusuf Galan, who was photographed being trained at a camp run by Osama bin Laden, is now in jail, awaiting trial in Madrid. The indictment against him, drawn up by investigating judge Baltasar Garzon, claims he was 'directly involved with the preparation and carrying out of the attacks ... by the suicide pilots on 11 September'.

Evidence of Galan's links with Iraqi government officials came to light only recently, as investigators pored through more than 40,000 pages of documents seized in raids at the homes of Galan and seven alleged co-conspirators. The Spanish authorities have supplied copies to lawyers in America, and this week the documents will form part of a dossier to be filed in a federal court in Washington, claiming damages of approximately $100 billion on behalf of more than 2,500 11 September victims.

The lawsuit lists Saddam's government in Iraq as one of its principal defendants, claiming it provided 'material support' to the al-Qaeda terrorists. Under US law, the victims' families do not have to prove active direction or involvement in the details of the 9/11 conspiracy by Iraq, only that Saddam's regime gave al-Qaeda more general assistance in the knowledge that it was planning to attack American targets.

Although some Western intelligence officials have expressed scepticism about an al-Qaeda-Iraq link, in recent months George Tenet, the Director of the CIA, has made increasingly strong statements alleging such a connection. In Congressional testimony last month, he said that Iraq had co-operated with al-Qaeda for 10 years, and that it had trained al-Qaeda members in bombmaking and the use of chemical and biological weapons. In an apparent attempt to refute the sceptics, he said this information 'comes from reliable sources'.

The evidence in support of the 9/11 damages claim cites several examples of this alleged co-operation. They include the terrorist training camp at Salman Pak near Baghdad, where former Iraqi intelligence brigadier Jamal al-Qurairy has said that non-Iraqi Islamic radicals were trained to hijack aircraft using knives.

It also includes a new affirmation by the Czech government that Mohamed Atta, the leader of the 9/11 plotters, met an Iraqi intelligence officer, Ibrahim al-Ani, in Prague in April 2001. Some US officials have suggested this meeting did not happen. But in a signed statement dated 24 February, 2003, Hynek Kmonicek, the Czech ambassador to the UN, says his government 'can confirm that during the stay of Mohamed Atta ... there was contact with Mr al-Ani, who was on 22 April, 2001 expelled from the Czech Republic on the basis of activities not compatible with his diplomatic status [the usual euphemism for spying]'. Garzon's indictment says Galan was part of a cell which organized bank robberies on behalf of al-Qaeda, and which had supported the group around Atta financially and logistically


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; 911hijackers; alqaeda; alqaedaandiraq; galan; hamburgcell; iraq; iraqiambassador; spain; yusufgalan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: vishnu2
Hope it's a Bush plot, or hope I'm being sarcastic?
61 posted on 03/16/2003 12:55:30 AM PST by graycamel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
BUMP.

62 posted on 03/16/2003 1:06:21 AM PST by WarSlut (It's the dictator, stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
So we have the director George Tenet and the ex- director of the CIA, James Woolsey telling us that Iraq was involved.

Media has the choice of believing the liberal rant or two CIA directors.

Believe there is more evidence out there too.

On James Woolsey below:

With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff For the story behind the story...

Friday, March 7, 2003 1:57 p.m. EST

CIA's Woolsey Tells Court: Iraq Involved in 9/11

Former CIA Director James Woolsey offered bombshell testimony this week in a lawsuit brought by the families of World Trade Center victims that implicates Saddam Hussein in the 9/11 attacks.

The one-time Clinton administration intelligence chief described what he said was a conspiracy between al-Qaeda and Baghdad. As evidence he offered accounts from Iraqi defectors who have described a Boeing 707 jet parked on the ground at the terrorist training camp Salman Pak. The plane, the eyewitnesses insist, was used as a hijacking school prior to 9/11.

Since 1995 Saddam's most elite terror operatives had allegedly used Salman Pak to train al-Qaeda recruits to overcome U.S. flight crews using methods employed on 9/11, according to London's Observer newspaper. In November 2001, dozens of other reports, including several in the New York Times, covered news of Saddam's Salman Pak hijacking school based on the defectors' accounts.

"I believe it is definitely more likely than not that some degree of common knowledge between [al-Qaeda and Iraq] was involved here," Woolsey told a Manhattan federal court on Monday, according to the New York Daily News.

He compared the relationship between Baghdad and Osama bin Laden's terror network to two Mafia families "who hate each other, kill each other from time to time but are still capable of working together against a common enemy," according to testimony quoted by the Associated Press.

At the very least, Saddam Hussein is guilty of aiding and abetting the activities of al-Qaeda, Woolsey contended.

He also offered evidence suggesting that Baghdad had prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks.

A July 21, 2001, article in an Egyptian newspaper, headlined "America, an Obsession with Osama bin Laden," indicated that Baghdad knew what was coming less than months later, the former U.S. intelligence chief told the court. The report, written by an Iraqi, predicted bin Laden would target both New York City and the Pentagon.

Woolsey noted a line in the story warning that bin Laden would "strike America on the arm that is already hurting," explaining that the phrase was likely a reference to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

No Iraqi journalist would write such a report without his government's knowledge and approval, Woolsey testified.

63 posted on 03/16/2003 5:03:20 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Link or no link the UN is not an ally, it is the antithesis of the United States of America. We need to leave the UN, regroup with countries that understand freedom, the defense of freedom, individual rights vs the state/collective, the rule of law.
64 posted on 03/16/2003 5:34:52 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Bump
65 posted on 03/16/2003 5:40:35 AM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Sunday morning Bump
66 posted on 03/16/2003 6:54:38 AM PST by oceanperch (Support Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM; Sunshine55; RGSpincich; cyncooper
I didn't think about it being the weekend guys. This is like a smoking gun IMHO. I hope the word gets out...and it's big news soon. ;-\
67 posted on 03/16/2003 8:26:35 AM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Maybe it gets mentioned at the Azores Press conference later...
68 posted on 03/16/2003 8:34:19 AM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
That's true! I hope so...
69 posted on 03/16/2003 8:58:54 AM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Let the bombing begin!

Let's Roll!
70 posted on 03/16/2003 12:58:58 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

.
71 posted on 03/17/2003 5:47:41 PM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: graycamel
It's all propaganda so Bush can take Iraq's oil and impose white rule over an Arab country.

Yippie!! $30+ a tank is for the birds.

72 posted on 03/17/2003 5:53:24 PM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth
I don't care if the gas is a million dollars per milliliter. I'm looking into getting a tiny car like a Yugo so I can laugh at all these people who drive the pickups and Suv's. They think they're cool and macho. They think they're safe, too. I'm a heck of a lot safer in a little car as I can swerve and avoid accidents and since I cover less ground, I will have less chance of a collision!
73 posted on 03/18/2003 1:08:05 AM PST by graycamel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: graycamel
I get 30 mpg, and have double-wishbone suspension. You're preaching to the choir. That said, I still wouldn't mind $0.79/gal. Even though it might benefit some others more than me, it will still benefit me as well. There's no need to be such a Democrat about it - i.e. if I can't get as big a tax cut as someone else, then nobody should get one.
74 posted on 03/18/2003 5:17:26 AM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth
I was being sarcastic. I would figure if the price was high the rats would support drilling for oil in Alaska. I drive a beat-up 85 Mercury. I wish I could afford better, but I'm in school.
75 posted on 03/18/2003 10:46:04 PM PST by graycamel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
bttt
76 posted on 09/19/2003 7:54:04 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson