Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spain links suspect in 9/11 plot to Baghdad
The Observer (U.K.) ^ | 03/16/03 | David Rose

Posted on 03/15/2003 5:08:26 PM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: gkhong
There is no link between Saddam and 9-11, move along nothing to see here. (sarcasm..for those who need the note) :)
21 posted on 03/15/2003 6:21:55 PM PST by BriarBey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve; deport; blackie; nickcarraway; Salvation; Siobhan
ping
22 posted on 03/15/2003 6:32:55 PM PST by Lady In Blue (Bush,Cheney,Rumsfeld,Rice 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Maeve; Pokey78
Ah, Spain ! What a great ally ! Way to go ! . . .
23 posted on 03/15/2003 6:37:16 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Thanks for the ping, TK. The left is in denial on this issue.
24 posted on 03/15/2003 6:44:03 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: graycamel
Let's hope so.
25 posted on 03/15/2003 6:52:50 PM PST by vishnu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
C'mon, everyone knows that Saddam (who had a Koran commissioned written with his own blood) is "Secular" and therefore he'd never work with someone who is "Religious" like an Al Qaedan. Secular and Religious, never the twain shall meet, even if they have identical goals.

Also, Saddam would never ever lift a finger to injure us, not even through middle-men who would keep his hands clean (at least to the satisfaction of the Western Left), because he knows that Iraq would immediately be destroyed if he did. He knows that! Everyone knows he knows that. (We all know everything there is to know about Saddam's internal thought processes: what he knows, what he doesn't know...)

Also, this evidence, whatever it is, even if it's true, Isn't A Smoking Gun. Where's the proof??? I need a Perry Mason Moment on live television (with dramatic music in the background) proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that Saddam has killed some American or another before I'm mentally prepared to act in my own self-defense.

(And so on...have I missed anything?)

26 posted on 03/15/2003 6:53:54 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY; graycamel
Good thing I saw the tag line before I exploded with anger!

You and me both! GC, taglines are a bit subtle - try putting this up after such a post: </SARCASM>

27 posted on 03/15/2003 6:59:27 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
They tell me the memory is first thing to go in old age...

I wish I could find that idiot that I was arguing with on FR who stated unequiviably that the Czech government had recanted that a meeting had taken place with Atta. Where the hell is that idiot now???.....

It also includes a new affirmation by the Czech government that Mohamed Atta, the leader of the 9/11 plotters, met an Iraqi intelligence officer, Ibrahim al-Ani, in Prague in April 2001. Some US officials have suggested this meeting did not happen. But in a signed statement dated 24 February, 2003, Hynek Kmonicek, the Czech ambassador to the UN, says his government 'can confirm that during the stay of Mohamed Atta ... there was contact with Mr al-Ani, who was on 22 April, 2001 expelled from the Czech Republic on the basis of activities not compatible with his diplomatic status [the usual euphemism for spying]'. Garzon's indictment says Galan was part of a cell which organized bank robberies on behalf of al-Qaeda, and which had supported the group around Atta financially and logistically

Semper Fi

28 posted on 03/15/2003 7:02:00 PM PST by Trident/Delta (Colt 1911 .45ACP .... The "original" point and click device.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich; MeeknMing
Why isn't this thread 300+ posts by now?
29 posted on 03/15/2003 7:08:57 PM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BriarBey
"There is no link between Saddam and 9-11, move along nothing to see here. (sarcasm..for those who need the note) :)"

Hark, do I sense a Star Wars connection here?
30 posted on 03/15/2003 7:09:33 PM PST by outpost44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dinok
You can have video of Saddam and Bin-Laden talking about bombing New York and the anti-America crowd would say it was just a social call.

Or they would say it was a video that the US government made with look-a-likes in Arizona

31 posted on 03/15/2003 7:11:44 PM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: graycamel; facedown
I am stupid then! LOL

I admit idiot and garbage were among the "nice" words that were whirling around in my head!

Well I got there as did facedown...eventually!!

This prolonged pre-war has us all on edge.
32 posted on 03/15/2003 7:13:28 PM PST by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dinok
And OJ is innocent, it was all a frame up by that neo-nazi Mark "Swastika" Fuhrman.
33 posted on 03/15/2003 7:17:39 PM PST by appeal2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trident/Delta
I wish I could find that idiot that I was arguing with on FR who stated unequiviably that the Czech government had recanted that a meeting had taken place with Atta. Where the hell is that idiot now???.....

It wasn't me, but yes, the Czech government has given conflicting statements on the meeting. The important thing though, is that they have only made statements about the meeting, not presented any evidence (e.g. a photo). Since they didn't know Atta in April 2001 they would have had to figure out that it was Atta after 9/11. That requires evidence and so far they have chosen not to reveal any. Of course that doesn't mean there isn't any, but their allegations are spurious without it.

34 posted on 03/15/2003 7:23:26 PM PST by palmer (receive this important and informative post - FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: graycamel
Can someone here verify that WTC I 's(1993) Ramzi Youssef, who together with KSM (Khalid Sheik Muhammed---A-Q ops chief), worked on the Multple Manila Airline Bomb plot ? And that Ramzi was clearly linked to Saddam? Or am I imagining things?
35 posted on 03/15/2003 7:34:57 PM PST by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY
I am stupid then! LOL

Not in the least.

Jumpy, yes, as are all of us who understand how serious all of this is.

As (I think) Ben Franklin once said "Hope for the best and prepare for the worst and you'll never be disappointed."

36 posted on 03/15/2003 7:37:12 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Where did you find that picture and is it what Michael Savage is looking for? I only saw one or two of these right after 9-11 and never have seen them again.

Maybe he has this kind of picture, but can not get permission to use it on his show.
37 posted on 03/15/2003 7:42:30 PM PST by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Thanks, TexKat! We like Spain, don't we?
38 posted on 03/15/2003 7:44:51 PM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
"And that Ramzi was clearly linked to Saddam?"

----

Laurie Mylroie said so and laid it all out in her book.

Here is an excerpt to a CNN interview with her:

MYLROIE: You can demonstrate to the high legal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt, which is used for criminal conviction, that Iraq was behind the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, by showing that Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind of that bomb, was an Iraqi intelligence agent. I do that in "Study of Revenge." That bomb, in 1993, aimed to topple the north tower onto the south tower. Eight years later, someone came back and finished the job. Since Iraq was behind the first attack, it is suggestive of the point that Iraq was behind the second attack.

http://www.cnn.com/2001/COMMUNITY/10/29/mylroie/index.html


And here is a more detailed article also written by her about this:

http://www.meib.org/articles/0106_ir1.htm
Iraqi Complicity in the World Trade Center Bombing and Beyond


And here is a link to her book on Amazon.com:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/006009771X/qid%3D1016304788/sr%3D8-2/ref%3Dsr%5F8%5F67%5F2/102-0590748-8678517

39 posted on 03/15/2003 7:47:46 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: graycamel
"What idiot would write garbage like that?!"

That's exactly what I thought.....until I saw your tag line.

40 posted on 03/15/2003 7:51:03 PM PST by CommandoFrank (Saddam's ass is grass and we own the lawn mower...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson