Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Law Professor urges UN to invade USA? Could U.N. use military force on U.S.?
www.worldnetdaily.com ^ | march 15,2003 | Art Moore

Posted on 03/15/2003 10:46:05 AM PST by longtermmemmory

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-252 next last
To: 11B3; Grampa Dave
Belt fed liberal eraser.

I LOVE IT!!!

But we've got worse problems than just "useful idiot" liberals.
This has been a long time coming:

We shall unleash the Nihilists and Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effects of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will be from that moment without compass, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view, a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.

Illustrious Albert Pike 33°
Letter 15 August 1871
Addressed to Grand Master Guiseppie Mazzini 33°
Archives British Museum
London, England

Pike planned three world wars, the third of which was to bring about a global government. This is it.
81 posted on 03/15/2003 12:12:50 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
Cub Scout Pack 402 is ready and waiting! Bring 'em on!
82 posted on 03/15/2003 12:14:20 PM PST by SolutionsOnly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Risa
oops an error correction: I meant to say--

....who made it possible for him to aqcuire a law degree and all the material benefits arising out of the inflated wages commanded by this degree.

I am so angry, I really should settle down before expressing any thought--He's just such a terrible insult to our troops and an ugly cancer on the thought of Americans.
83 posted on 03/15/2003 12:14:29 PM PST by Risa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: xrp
With talk of Bill Clinton vying for the Koffi Annan's general secretary job, do we have any doubts Clinton (either bill OR hillary) would support such a UN "peacekeeping " invasion?
84 posted on 03/15/2003 12:15:20 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Law Professor urges UN to invade USA? Could U.N. use military force on U.S.?

Here's a bit of irony: For a number of years now, a number of European nations have been dumping their surplus military firearms and parts onto the market, turning those old crates of "outdated" equipment into cash. Guess where most of those parts ended up?

The Weasels will find out, if they come here.


85 posted on 03/15/2003 12:15:24 PM PST by Cloud William
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: e_engineer
>>President Bush activates 5 cub scout troops to thwart UN attack.<<

A great comic relief! hehe.

risa
86 posted on 03/15/2003 12:16:46 PM PST by Risa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Private US citizens could take on the UN "army"...leaving the US military to more important things. Like payback.

How about a flag?

It's GONE!!!

87 posted on 03/15/2003 12:17:17 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
This would be called World War 3, and its my guess the U.N. would be standing with a hand full of member states against the United States, England, Spain, Eastern Europe,Canada,
Japan, Taiwan,Latin America,Australia and many more.

Let them self destruct.
Gods will be done!
Revelation!

Ops4 God Bless America!!!
88 posted on 03/15/2003 12:17:58 PM PST by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
I am curious. How do you know it is the infamous Noam Chomsky?

risa
89 posted on 03/15/2003 12:19:33 PM PST by Risa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
You're too much! "Liberalism is for girls" is hysterical too...
90 posted on 03/15/2003 12:19:34 PM PST by tuna_battle_slight_return
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
If the UN goes to war against the US(and our 30 or so 'unilateral' partners), would we win if we captured their headquartes? Lesseee.....where would that be?? Gosh! Think of it. The NYPD could actually win the whole thing!
91 posted on 03/15/2003 12:21:57 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
The article says:   "The willingness by the U.S. and Britain to go to war with Iraq without Security Council authorization is the kind of threat the U.N. had in mind when it passed Resolution 377 in 1950, said Michael RATner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights."

  1. The Constitution does not make the power of the President to act as Commander-in-Chief, subject to the approval of the UN or any other body.

  2. The Constitution cannot be amended by treaty, such as the one we have with the UN.

  3. Since the UN has no military force, and since we are the strongest military in the world, which country or combination of countries will be stupid enough to step forward and take on the task? Bring it on, dummie.

  4. If the UN declares war on America, then the UN buildings in New York become a "free fire zone" for anyone, military or militia, to take aim at.

  5. In fact, those even advocating such an attack should consider themselves to be standing in the middle of a free fire zone.

  6. U.S. citizens conspiring to commit war against their own country is the very essence of treason. It is high time to consider revoking the citizenship and deporting these traitors.

  7. There is nothing about the First Amendment, freedom of speech and redress of grievences that protects a U.S. citizen when advocating a foreign military attack on our country.

--Boot Hill
92 posted on 03/15/2003 12:23:26 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
"Not all of the armies of Europe combined could take one drink from the Mississippi without our let and leave"

- Abraham Lincoln

Why is Lincoln's English so poor?

93 posted on 03/15/2003 12:23:39 PM PST by tuna_battle_slight_return
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Yeah right, the UN will invade us. They'd be picked off from behind every tree, bush and McDonald's before they could figure out what was going on.

It's one of the reasons the Russians scrapped invasion plans. The R.T.K.A.B.A. as specified in our Second Amendment. A little thing that's spared America from much grief.

Small wonder the UN is a group of gun grabbing b*stards.

94 posted on 03/15/2003 12:24:04 PM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
I thought these jokers (anti-war protesters) didn't believe in fighting? Isn't it interesting that they protest the US using force to oust a brutal dictator that poses a threat to our national security, but they advocate the use of force to stop us from doing this.

Hypocrisy running amock! They disagree with force used to oust Saddam, but they agree with force used to stop the ousting of Saddam. It shows their priorities and motivations.

95 posted on 03/15/2003 12:26:15 PM PST by undeniable logic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Risa
It says right there: JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY.

You're right, I shouldn't be making the leap, but I just couldn't envision a person with that name as a leftist New York lawyer who wasn't in some way related and under the effluents. As it turns out, she's Noam's sister-in-law.

96 posted on 03/15/2003 12:27:21 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
I heard that there were 4 MILLION deer hunting licenses bought last year. 4 million zeroed in high powered rifles with scopes not included with the regular military. The UN would get a serious a$$ kickin.
97 posted on 03/15/2003 12:28:53 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
Would the US army stand down, if ordered by a Pres. Hillary Clinton, in the the face of a UN action against the USA?

As a practical matter, how would citizens know? Emergency Broadcast System?
98 posted on 03/15/2003 12:29:46 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: choicenotecho
You mean this:

In 1988, Michael Dukakis was poised to lose the presidential election in an ass-whumping of epic proportions. He became convinced that his only hope of closing the gap was to simultaneously:

- demonstrate his commitment to military spending
- hunt and kill furloughed Massachusetts prisoners for sport

When asked about whether his primary motivation for joining Dukakis was the Governor's political track record or his support for economic reform, Mojo replied, "He gots him a tank." The aforementioned tank had been retrofitted with a Pedestrian Electro-Bastard Death Ray, hydraulic suspension, and a Funny Car Turbo Nitrous booster system.

What began as a prime photo opportunity degenerated into carnage and mayhem when Dukakis, fed up with Mojo calling him a "swarthy little Unibrow Muppet" and prodding him to "Punch it! Punch it!", elected to punch it. Mojo's hand grenade flew loose and decimated a CNN lighting crew, while unlucky members of the fourth estate became grease spots under the tank's massive treads.

Rather than call the whole day a wash, Mojo and Dukakis mowed a path of destruction to a nearby park where, lacking any released prisoners to hunt, they unleashed their massive arsenal on a troupe of amateur mimes who, as it turns out, really can make noise when it counts.

99 posted on 03/15/2003 12:31:26 PM PST by tuna_battle_slight_return
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: e_engineer
Here is an alternative I received by email.

Subject: Old Soldiers aka old farts w/attitude problems

I've said that if I could, I'd enlist today and help my country track down those responsible for killing thousands of innocent people in New York City and Washington, D.C. But, I'm over 60 now and the Armed Forces say I'm too old to track down terrorists. You can't be older than 35 to join the Army.

They've got the whole thing backwards. Instead of sending 18-year-olds off to fight, they ought to take us old guys. You shouldn't be able to join until you're at least 35.

For starters: Researchers say 18-year-olds think about sex every 10 seconds. Old guys only think about sex a couple of times a day, leaving us more that 28,000 additional seconds per day to concentrate on the enemy.

Young guys haven't lived long enough to be cranky, and a cranky soldier is a dangerous soldier. If we can't kill the enemy, we'll complain them into submission. "My back hurts!" "I'm hungry!" "Where's the remote control?"

An 18-year-old hasn't had a legal beer yet and you shouldn't go to war until you're at least old enough to legally drink. An average old guy, on the other hand, has consumed 126,000 gallons of beer by the time he's 35 and a jaunt through the desert heat with a backpack and M-60 would do wonders for the old beer belly.

An 18-year-old doesn't like to get up before 10 a.m. Old guys get up early just to show we can (and to steal the neighbor's newspaper and pee).

If old guys are captured we couldn't spill the beans because we'd probably forget where we put them. In fact, name, rank, and serial number would be a real brain teaser.

Boot camp would actually be easier for old guys. We're used to getting screamed and yelled at and we actually like soft food. We've also developed a deep appreciation for guns and rifles. We like them almost better than naps. The army could lighten up on the obstacle course, however. I've been to the desert and didn't see a single 20-foot wall with rope hanging over the side. I can hear the Drill Sergeant now, "Get down and give me...er...one." And the running part is kind of a waste of energy. I've never seen anyone outrun a bullet.

An 18-year-old has the whole world ahead of him. He's still learning to shave. To actually carry on a conversation. To wear pants without the top of the boxer shorts sticking out. To learn that a pierced tongue catches food particles. And that a 200-watt speaker in the back seat of a Honda Accord can rupture an eardrum. All great reasons to keep our sons at home and to learn a little more about life before sending them off to a possible death.

Let us old guys track down those dirty, rotten cowards who attacked our hearts on September 11. The last thing they'd want to see right now is a couple of million old farts with attitudes.

regards - red

100 posted on 03/15/2003 12:32:11 PM PST by rednek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson