Yes. If you read the Web site, you will see that everything on it is extensively sourced and based on identifiable documentation, including the above. Perhaps you should do your homework and read what I've written before asking me if I've done my homework.
There is no claim of fact on my site which isn't documented and sourceable. The only thing that is debateable on my site is whether and how those facts come together, and I clearly indicate throughout my work the speculative nature of any connection that isn't clearly proven.
(It sounds to me like you are going to 'artfully dance in the shadows' in showing any complicity of other people, groups or foreign governments in a 'theory' of your own devising re: the OKC bombing...)
Again, there is no claim on my site which is not verifiable. The only question is whether the facts listed are provably connected.
I do not claim anywhere in my series of articles (or anywhere else) to have proven a connection. I do believe that there is clearly sufficient circumstantial evidence to merit further investigation in search of concrete proof.
I am also not interested in getting into a pissing match about this. It's a waste of my time, and presumably a waste of yours as well. If you find a factual error on my site, feel free to bring it to my attention. Otherwise, trading barbs based solely on opinion and preconception frankly bores me.
-j