To: areafiftyone
If the UN security council can't lead, follow or get the heck out of the way, then what is the real motive of the council? And for who's security?
17 posted on
03/13/2003 1:36:27 PM PST by
rudypoot
To: rudypoot
"And for who's security? "
Why the security of the majority of countries in the UN of course. Despots and thugs all!!!! That is what is going on here...I believe the administration is going about this whole UN/Iraq UN/North Korea thing perfectly. If you look at it...both situations will bring the UN irrelevance to the fore and that is all part of this...in my opinion.
31 posted on
03/13/2003 1:54:15 PM PST by
Ga Rob
("Consensus is the ABSENCE of Leadership" The Iron Lady)
To: rudypoot
The united nations is a front for the worldwide communist/socialist/fascist control of the world... with killing jews and christians as it's focus... apparently... and AMERICAN power is standing in their way...
To: rudypoot
If the UN security council can't lead, follow or get the heck out of the way, then what is the real motive of the council? Countries are alignining along cultural/racial lines. That's the new World Order. The USA will eventually be the big loser since we're not a monocultural society. Multiculturalism is a tyranny and can only be imposed against the wishes of the people. Thirld World immigration is destroying our country.
History will prove me right.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson