Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moslems are destroying the Temple Mount
Jewsweek ^ | 3-12-03 | Richard L. Benkin

Posted on 03/12/2003 11:29:19 AM PST by SJackson

 
Moslems are destroying the Temple Mount

The site of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem is being systematically looted and destroyed by the Moslem authorities, and no one seems willing to prevent it.
 
by Richard L. Benkin March 12, 2003
 
 

 
   

 
     
   

HANDLE WITH PRAYER: Muslims hold noon prayers at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, with the Dome of the Rock mosque seen in background, in east Jerusalem's Old City.

   
     

 

 

Israel's friends and supporters marvel at how anyone could fail to see the justice of our position. There are 15 Arab states in the Middle East, sitting upon two-thirds of the world's oil reserves-all of them obsessed with ousting the region's one tiny Jewish state. Why are they so focused on that tiny scrap of land, no larger than the state of New Jersey - a land that was little more than swamp and desert before modern Zionists started transforming it; a land with no oil wealth; a land virtually abandoned by Arabs for centuries?

The answer is clear for those who wish to see. The various ideologies motivating the Arab world - from Saudi Arabia's Wahabi Islam to Syria's faux socialism - do not accept any non-Muslim state in the Middle East. We could cite their philosophies, speeches and sermons, official documents, and more. More convincing, is an unvarnished report about Arab actions at Jerusalem's Temple Mount, which have become a metaphor for the entire conflict, and allow us to see the battle in the true light that animates it. This conflict transcends any simplistic land for peace formulae or negotiated giveaway of the territories regained in 1967. The belief that Israel's enemies want a "two-state solution" is a chimera.

 

   
 
 
"... The belief that Israel's enemies want a "two-state solution" is a chimera ..."
 
 

Most people, who follow reports of military exploits, terrorist acts, and so forth, are unaware of activity on and about the Temple Mount, where tradition places Abraham's sacrifice of Isaac, Jesus' preaching, and Mohammed's ascent into heaven. Beyond tradition, extensive archeological and other evidence locates both ancient Jewish Temples on the site. Yet, despite that Mount of evidence, and the lateness and ambiguity of any Moslem contention, it has been official Arab policy in recent decades to deny any historical Jewish connection to Jerusalem's Temple Mount. That's Arab policy, not Hamas, Palestinian, or Iraqi. At first glance, the notion sounds absurd; and it is absurd. Not just another piece of Arab propaganda, however, it is part of an ongoing Arab attempt to de-legitimize Judaism.

While many consider Israel's liberation of Jerusalem and Judaism's holiest sites from Arab occupation the crowning achievement of the 1967 Six-Day War; few know that even before the war's end, Moshe Dayan ceded control of the Mount to the Waqf. Secularist Israeli leaders, like Dayan, saw the Mount as merely an "historical curiosity" for Jews, but respected its religious significance for Moslems. Certainly, it is to our everlasting credit as a tolerant people that Israel did this. Could you even imagine any Arab country paying the same homage to Jewish religious sensitivities? While Jewish prayer at the Mount or Western Wall was prohibited during the years of Arab occupation, it is unthinkable that Israel would ban Moslem prayer at al-Aqsa. Since then, successive Israeli governments have maintained a policy of non-interference with Waqf actions, while banning Jewish and Christian prayer there. At the same time, deliberate Arab efforts to destroy any vestige of a Jewish presence on the Mount have proceeded almost unchecked.

In recent years, the Waqf has engaged in extensive and unsupervised "renovation" of the Mount, building a new mosque under its southeast corner and cutting additional exits through the Temple Mount walls. While it did, the Waqf blocked any archeological supervision of the work. Without any oversight, they ripped physical evidence of the Temple from the Mount and secreted it-often mixed with present-day garbage-in various spots around Jerusalem, most notably the Kidron Valley between Jerusalem's eastern wall and the Mount of Olives.

The Arabs, of course, claim that it's all a hoax. In their media and from their pulpits, they repeat their mantra of a Jewish conspiracy to undermine the Moslems' claim to the Mount. One Iranian piece quotes the Jerusalem mufti of accusing those who have protested Waqf actions as creating "a big hue and cry to justify [Israel's] interference in [Moslem] affairs." And he emphasized that the Mount is a sacred place "only for the Muslims, around the globe."

Recently, Waqf agents began cleaning one of the giant cisterns under the Mount. This complex of cisterns served as reservoirs for the First and Second Temples, and for the entire population of ancient Jerusalem. Why is this significant? It turns out that this is part of an effort by Moslem religious leaders to fill the cisterns with water from Mecca's Zamzam Spring. This would make our Temple Mount a site for Moslem pilgrims with weight equal to the Great Mosque in Mecca, Islamicize the Mount, and buttress Arab pretexts for denying all Israeli claims to the Old City of Jerusalem.

The destruction continues. The UN, of course, is silent. UNESCO, the body that is supposed to oversee such things, has ignored its mandate on this issue, content to issue anti-Israeli diatribes instead. That leaves another immediate danger. Recent surveys indicate that due to the Moslem construction, the southern wall of the Temple Mount is near collapse. Although Jordanian engineers finally prevailed upon the Waqf to allow them to effect some repairs, few authorities believe their efforts will correct the extensive damage to the Temple Mount. The potential for a collapse remains. When those walls fall, they could kill thousands of Moslem worshippers. With their leaders seeing Jewish plots behind every corner in the Middle East, such a disaster easily could spark a holy war of Moslems against Jews. The events still unfolding at the site of our Temples threaten both our history and our future.

A couple years ago, I stood atop Mt. Nebo, located in the "moderate" Arab state of Jordan. Noting Christian and Moslem elements, I asked my Jordanian guide why this spot, where Moses watched the Israelites cross into Canaan before he died, had not a single sign of a Jewish presence. He replied casually, "Well, there are no Jews in Jordan."

Glimpse the future of Jewish holy sites in Hebron and elsewhere under PA control! Under Arab hegemony, the Jewish residents from Jerusalem's Old City were expelled and all vestiges of its presence there removed. Mosques have been built upon Jewish holy sites, such as Rachael's Tomb near Bethlehem. Glimpse the future of Jewish holy sites in Hevron and elsewhere under PA control! If current actions are left unchecked, the Temple Mount will fare likewise. It happened then, and it's happening now.

We can debate the reasons why this uncommonly common and tiny piece of real estate occupies the world's attention; why the UN passes a never-ending series of resolutions about it while ignoring greater issues, as well as atrocities, elsewhere.

Wherever those arguments may take us, there can be little doubt that publicizing this Arab attempt to erase history can only lay bare the true intentions of the enemies of Israel-as well as enemies of Judaism, Christianity, and the principles of religious freedom.



TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: templemount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: ET(end tyranny)
A Peaceful Solution To Building The Next TEMPLE In Yerusalem
If anyone's interested here's a Muslim site regarding the area: The Noble Sanctuary. It looks like this plan may be compatible with the current layout.

In ten to twenty years that is....after a fair peace plan has been developed and the extremists on both sides have been marginalized. The first step is going to have to be peace in the region.

-Eric

41 posted on 03/13/2003 4:56:49 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: The Ghost of Richard Nixon
So where's Mr. Vancier's Nobel Peace prize -- afterall, his activities were directly responsible for rescuing millions of persecuted Jews from the former Soviet Union?
He contributed to the fall of the Soviet Union how? By stinkbombing cultural performances? By attacking consulates? By making terroristic threats? Sheeeesh....

-Eric

43 posted on 03/13/2003 6:26:24 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
johno->I've read the book and the Jews will have their third temple built on temple mount

BSunday->What book would that be? (The Bible doesn't say it, so you must be talking about some other book)

Actually the bible does say it.

First you need to understand that the Holy Place is a part of the Temple. From Exodus when the description of the tabernacle of the cogregation was given, to 1 Kings where the dimensions of the temple were laid out, throughout the entire old testament and into the new, the Holy Place always refers to the inner room of the temple (which room is itself divided into the holy place and the holy of holies by the veil)

1 Kings 8:1-9:3 Tells of Soloman building the first temple and God putting His Name there forever.

The temple of Soloman was built on temple mount. Temple mount is where God put His name forever, his eyes and his heart shall be there perpetually. This temple was destroyed when Judah was carried carried into Babylon.

Ezra tells of the rebuilding of the temple. Ezra 5:11-17 tells of building the house of God in his place, that is, building the new temple on the same place as the old.

So the holy place, the place where sacrifices are to be made, is at Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

Dan 11:28-12:13 speaks of the abomination of desolation and the daily sacrifice being taken away. The daily sacrifice was made at the Temple. So this scripture requires the existence of a temple at the time of the abomination. (The daily sacrifice must be in existence for it to be taken away and the daily sacrifice is only offered at the temple)

In Matthew 24:1-31 Jesus tells his disciples the signs of the end time and what must happen before then.

Matt 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)

First the gospel must be preached in all the world. Only then can the daily sacrifice be taken away.

21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

So after the antichrist takes away the sacrifice the great tribulation starts. After the tribulation Jesus returns and the whole world sees Him.

The bible tells us that this hasn't happened yet. Jesus was telling the future so it didn't happen in his days. In 70AD the temple was destroyed and Jerusalem was sacked, HOWEVER, the gospel had not been preached in the new world yet so this is not the abomination spoken of by Jesus. Also, after the sack of Jerusalem the entire world did not see Jesus return in glory (as foretold in Matt 24:29-30).

From 70AD until now in 2003 there has been no temple where the daily sacrifice can be offered. So we know the abomination did not occur between 70AD and now.

We have an event foretold in Daniel 12 which requires the daily sacrifice to be taken away. In order for this to be fulfilled a new temple must be built.

So the Bible does assure us that the new temple will be built.

44 posted on 03/13/2003 6:30:11 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: John O
The Bible tells us that we are the temple now (I Cor 3:16, 6:19). Therefore there is no more need of a physical temple. When Jesus died on the cross the temple veil was torn asunder, signifying that we no longer need a priest to enter into the holy of holies, for Christ entered once for all.

As far as the word forever is used in reference to the Jews and their religion, you should know that forever as used in the Old Testament frequently refers simply to "an indefinite time period" vice literally for eternity. In other words, the promises given to the Jews were predicated on their obedience, which they failed at. The Bible teaches that the church of Christ is spiritual Israel now. The Romans destroyed the temple along with Jerusalem in 70 AD, forever taking away the sacrifices. This is the abomination of desolation spoken of by Jesus.

As far as the gospel being preached to all the world, that requirement was fulfilled in the book of Acts (Acts 1:8). In fact, as the book closes, we find the gospel has travelled from some remote outpost of the Roman Empire, all the way to the seat of civilization.

"Also, after the sack of Jerusalem the entire world did not see Jesus return " What you missed was that there is no specified time, long or short, occuring in between what happens in verse 29 and 30. IE verse 30 could come 1 hour after or 2000 years after verse 29.

The Bible has no such doctrine as contained in the popular "Left Behind" series. There is not going to be an earthly reign of Jesus for 1000 years ("My kingdom is not of this world"). The temple was not promised to be rebuilt. The Bible does not teach that a long period of time passes between the so-called rapture (word is nowhere in the Bible) and when Jesus comes again. It is all a bunch of false teaching resulting from taking figurative things too literally, and failing to proper contexutalize, which will not stand up to proper scrutiny.

45 posted on 03/13/2003 7:12:04 AM PST by BSunday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: BSunday
I was going to repsond but we'll never see eye to eye on this and I haven't the time to lay it all out again today.

May God's richest blessing chase you down.

48 posted on 03/13/2003 8:09:44 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson