RAFSANJANI SAYS MUSLIMS SHOULD USE NUCLEAR WEAPON AGAINST ISRAEL (Iran)

He makes a very legimate point, e.g., that any small area's population can be wiped out, while a larger geographically spread out population has a higher probability of survival. However, this fool makes the point the by stating, "if and when we acquire Nukes we will use them" and herein lies the issue of why President Bush labeled Iran among those in the Axis of Evil - all three nations have no scruples in holding back. Iran has since the inception of the current regime, flaunted her embassies as dens of corruption and illegial enities (In the mid-80's the Iranian Embassy in Buriut was surround 24-hours a day due to America hostiages being held in the basement - and a certain US Ambassador took family members there on X-mas to visit); Iran understood that she was caught and if exposed she would be literally expelled from the international community - a very stubble use of American Diplomatic Power to achieve longer term goals....). Iraq has used these weapons and advocates their use as doctine, much in keeping from the training recieved from his major supplier and political since the '70's Mother Russia herself; as for North Korea, she has violated South Korean waters and infiltrated commandos on a continuous basis - I've seen the boats, equipment, bodies and such at the UNC Operations prior to it's return under the guise of peace talks, attended by Communist nations and the Red Cross.... Each of these three countries will use these weapons, they have no reason to use them. All three nations will be disarmed within 10-years.

It sounds like another brilliant muslim strategy. They are salivating over the possibility of acquiring a handful of nuclear weapons. They will be unable to resist the temptation to use them on infidels when the infidels have thousands of such weapons. No wonder they haven't made much progress in over a millenium. It sounds like the story of the mouse who viciously attacked the elephant with intent to rape.

"Um....okay Mr. Rafasanjani, step up to the plate. YOU be next."

Next? We haven't even swung the bat yet. We have watched 3 fat pitches cross the plate for strikes and we have left the bat on our shoulder. There can't be a "next" until there's a "first". I have serious doubts about the "first".

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.