Skip to comments.
Can recently produced anthrax be distinguished from old anthrax?
self
Posted on 03/12/2003 9:31:18 AM PST by xzins
1. This is a question for those who might know.
2. Saddam has yet to turn over the 1st liter of anthrax or chemical agent or other biologic agent.
3. Does old agent need to be replaced with new to remain "weapons grade" agent?
4. If age of sample can be determined, then turning over even one liter would verify that he has been/is currently producing these things.
5. Perhaps this has been answered before. If so, sorry. In any case, an answer would be appreciated.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: anthrax; biologics; botulin; chemicals; liter; mustard; sarin; vx
1
posted on
03/12/2003 9:31:19 AM PST
by
xzins
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: xzins
Do you work for Hans Blix? ;-)
To: Badabing Badaboom
Do you have any idea if weapons grade anthrax has to be replaced so that it remains effective?
4
posted on
03/12/2003 9:43:51 AM PST
by
xzins
(Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
To: LurkedLongEnough
Yep...I'm head of the inspectors...responsible for training... :>) </sarcasm>
5
posted on
03/12/2003 9:45:36 AM PST
by
xzins
(Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
To: xzins
Newly produced anthrax can be found in an envelope addressed to Tom Daschle.
Older anthrax can be found in an envelope addressed to George Mitchell.
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Badabing Badaboom
What exactly can destroy anthrax? I have read it is very durable, but can sunlight destroy it?
hmmm...might I finally find a reason to be happy about being in Phoenix in July?
8
posted on
03/12/2003 9:49:05 AM PST
by
riri
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Badabing Badaboom
Can you cite references for such precision in dating?
To: xzins
Yes. Newly produced anthrax will appear to the FBI to have been produced by Dr. Steven Hatfill; older anthrax will appear to have been produced by a much younger Steven Hatfill.
11
posted on
03/12/2003 10:03:08 AM PST
by
Grut
To: Paleo Conservative
I seriously doubt that Carbon dating would distinguish between fresh and 3 year old antrax... It's not that accurate when we talk about such a short periods of time...
In my opinion it can be done much easily by by C13 NMR, same general technique as for determening for example, if caffeine came from coffee, tea or was synthesyzed in the lab...
To: Grut
:>)
13
posted on
03/12/2003 10:10:43 AM PST
by
xzins
(Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
To: Jersey Kid
As for ways to kill it, tons,
depending where you want to kill it...
Radiation (either Microwave, Gamma-Cobals 60 or E-beam), Plasma (either Hydrogen peroxide or paracetic acid),
Liquid chemicals wash (for example chlorox, formaldehyde,propylene oxide, hydrogen peroxide, acetone, toluene)
Gases of vapors (for example Ozone, Ethylene oxide gas, Hydrogen peroxide vapor).
Also UV from sun or from UV lamps
To: Jersey Kid
As far as I know, also, if stored at right conditions, it can stay effective for decades
To: Jersey Kid
I seriously doubt that Carbon dating would distinguish between fresh and 3 year old antrax... It's not that accurate when we talk about such a short periods of time... That's what I thought. From geolomorphology papers I read where carbon 14 dating was used, the labs results could date materials to a century or half century.
16
posted on
03/12/2003 12:14:35 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(This space left intentionally blank.)
To: Grut; All
Yes. Newly produced anthrax will appear to the FBI to have been produced by Dr. Steven Hatfill; older anthrax will appear to have been produced by a much younger Steven Hatfill.LOL!!!
17
posted on
03/12/2003 12:49:05 PM PST
by
Lael
("C'mon, George, lets NOT get wobbly in the legs" - Margaret Thatcher to George the First!)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: FrPR
Stay tuned for some amazing developments in the Hatfill-McFederal Feud.
P.S. Hatfill may not be completely innocent. He has absolutely no alibi for the night of the Chicago Fire. Reliable government witnesses also place him in the Hindenberg's hangar. One bad dude, for sure, and they'll prove it if it takes every last cent in the government exchequer.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson