Strawman. There are degrees, and I explained it. When it crosses over the line, it is fascism. Depite your embracing of it.
As I stated by your argument, safety requirements would be Facist... because after there is no inate RIGHT to a safe work environment, and after all don't employees have the RIGHT to choose to take unsafe risks by working in unsafe plants, etc. By your definition thats facism, which is not reality, regulatory frameworks are not Facism. Banking industry is highly regulated, how many dead assets and non performings a bank can have and still loan money etc, those regulations don't protect directly anyones "rights", so to you that means their facism.. of course I doubt anyone looking at the US banking industry would even begin to propose the notion its a government run facist industry. Your definition of what is or is not facist in business regulation doesn't even pass the most simple of smell tests. You may wish the world worked the way you believe it should, but it doesn't. Regulatory frameworks are hardly defacto facism, and your interpretation pretty much makes nearly all rules and regulations defacto facism... it doesn't hold water.