[PhiKapMom]

Does Clinton own this newspaper?

United States will veto as you cannot have a new Secretary General approved without all five positive votes from permanent members of the Security Council.

Why does this keep coming up?

[SauronOfMordor]

United States will veto as you cannot have a new Secretary General approved without all five positive votes from permanent members of the Security Council.

The Bush Administration would veto

A future Hillery Clinton administration would be another story. Get Bill into power, then Hillery works to submit the US to UN power. Finally Emperor Bill gets the Secretary-Generalship hereditory...

[PhilDragoo]

Why does this keep coming up?

Because traitorrapist42 continues to campaign for the anti-American vote.

Because it enhances Das Butch von Buchenvald's march into Washington.

Reality check: Unless Butch is successful in its coup next year, the U.S. delegate will veto this in a Trade Center minute.

Trust the Rosenbergs to keep at it 666 days a year.

[Mind-numbed Robot]

I have not read the replies beyond this so what I say may already have been said. I have said here on FR for more than a year that Bill and Hill's grand plan has always been for him to be Sec. Gen. of the U.N. while she is POTUS. Then there will be no barriers, other than us 2nd Amendment and freedom loving Americans, to socializing the world with them at the pentacle. That is their goal and they have many supporters.

[JebBush2008]

Bush will not even release files on Clinton or proceed with Bill's prosecution. Why on earth would he then veto Clinton becoming SC of the UN?

Face it, Bill’s biggest friend in DC in none other than George W. Bush.

[CDHart]

Why would the U.S. veto Clinton? I mean, I know why we should, but it wouldn't surprise me if we didn't.

Carolyn