Skip to comments.
CLINTON IS EVEN ODDS TO BE APPROVED AS THE NEXT SECRETARY GENERAL
Pittburgh Tribune ^
| Re-Print March 10, 2003 Original Feb 16, 2003
Posted on 03/10/2003 8:33:32 AM PST by kinghorse
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:02:49 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
666
1
posted on
03/10/2003 8:33:32 AM PST
by
kinghorse
To: kinghorse
US should exercise her VETO power on this one !!!
2
posted on
03/10/2003 8:35:18 AM PST
by
PetroniDE
(Zimmerman Telegram (1917) - Pearl Harbor (1941) - WTC (2001) - NEVER AGAIN...)
To: kinghorse
We can only hope that France, Russia, and Germany succede in their effort to make the UN irrelevent before Bubba takes over.
To: kinghorse
this story is bunk, it is required by UN Charter that the SG has to be a CONVICTED criminal thug
To: kinghorse
Does Clinton own this newspaper?
United States will veto as you cannot have a new Secretary General approved without all five positive votes from permanent members of the Security Council.
Why does this keep coming up?
5
posted on
03/10/2003 8:37:27 AM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
To: kinghorse
Get out of the UN NOW and evict and deport all the bloodsuckers in their building immediatly.
Problem solved, the bent one can't be appointed head of something that doesn't exist!
6
posted on
03/10/2003 8:37:31 AM PST
by
dalereed
To: kinghorse
WTF? Where are they getting this lead..
7
posted on
03/10/2003 8:38:01 AM PST
by
ewing
To: kinghorse
The morph into the NWO is about to be complete.
8
posted on
03/10/2003 8:39:06 AM PST
by
Lysander
(smoke 'em if ya got 'em)
To: kinghorse
9
posted on
03/10/2003 8:39:22 AM PST
by
BOBTHENAILER
(Just like Black September. One by one, we're gonna get 'em.)
To: kinghorse; Admin Moderator
I just checked the date -- no wonder I thought I had read this before. Why post something that has already been posted numerous times on here?
10
posted on
03/10/2003 8:39:24 AM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
To: kinghorse
With any luck, the UN will be irrelevant if not non-existent by then.
Antichrist? Don't be silly. Maybe his wife.
11
posted on
03/10/2003 8:39:47 AM PST
by
Salman
To: kinghorse
Give him a day or two in his new office and then the U.S. should drop out of the U.N.
12
posted on
03/10/2003 8:40:00 AM PST
by
Hatteras
(The Thundering Herd Of Turtles ROCK!)
To: kinghorse
This is fine with me. As long as the U.N has long since been disbanded. He can pretned to be whatever he wants.
13
posted on
03/10/2003 8:41:10 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: kinghorse
Yet, ANOTHER reason why should disban the UN.
14
posted on
03/10/2003 8:41:15 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: kinghorse
"Bill the Beast"? Does anyone really know who his father really was?
To: Republicus2001
Klinton hasn't been convicted, but I'm sure that they know he would have far more booze,women and drugs at his parties. This makes him a shoo-in.
16
posted on
03/10/2003 8:42:38 AM PST
by
Brett66
To: kinghorse
I'm sure that there would be a legal way to suspend his USSS protection and other tax-payer-subsidized perks if he becomes the new anti-Christ. Think of it, though. If we boot the UN out of the U.S., this piece of slime would have to relocate as well.....
17
posted on
03/10/2003 8:43:06 AM PST
by
tracer
(/b>)
To: sheik yerbouty
Wait a minute, I thought the SEC GEN couldnt be from a country that permanently sits on the Security Council?
18
posted on
03/10/2003 8:44:14 AM PST
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: kinghorse
I TOLD YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have been saying this for 4 years now!
He was running for head of the UN since he was president.
He wants to empower the UN so he can see himself as first LEADER OF THE WORLD.
OOOoooooohhh the smarmy things he will say when it happens...
19
posted on
03/10/2003 8:44:15 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(looking for love in all the right places (not left))
To: Brett66
If they let a Nazi like Kurt Waldheim be SG, what's the big deal about Clinton?
20
posted on
03/10/2003 8:44:30 AM PST
by
dfwgator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson