Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metesky
I agree with you. Higher premiums would solve the problem. You just articulated the solution better than I!
117 posted on 03/08/2003 5:04:16 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: ladyjane
Fact is, lj, the line about smoking is already on most insurance aps, and they do charge higher premiums if you admit to smoking, so let's start concentrating on getting the goobermint out of the health care business because it is 90% gub'mint paperwork and regs that have shot the cost of care through the roof.
119 posted on 03/08/2003 5:09:23 PM PST by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane
I agree with you. Higher premiums would solve the problem. You just articulated the solution better than I!

Smokers pay higher premiums now. Do those who own pets? How about the overweight? Couch potatoes? Poor family history? Inner city dwellers? Of all the risks possible in the insurance pool, smokers are the only ones who pay their own way.

120 posted on 03/08/2003 5:09:53 PM PST by Max McGarrity (Anti-smokers--still the bullies in the playground they always were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane
You don't get do you.
what astounds me most is "you don/t, get it !!!
Meteske is absolutly correct.
do your homework
you are up against a person who obviosly knows what he "or she) is talking about
131 posted on 03/08/2003 6:12:13 PM PST by Walnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson