Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perdue can't allow flag to stain legacy
Atlanta Journal Constitution ^ | 3/8/03 | AJC Editorial Staff

Posted on 03/07/2003 9:35:10 PM PST by WhiskeyPapa

When her father was elected governor, Leigh Perdue Brett marveled that her 4-year-old twins would someday read about their grandfather in history class. If Sonny Perdue does not show strong leadership on the Georgia flag, Sunni and Mary Kate might read that their granddad had been the most racially divisive governor of Georgia since Lester Maddox.

The state's reputation, its economy and race relations hang in the balance of Perdue's decision on the flag. This square of fabric will determine whether Georgia is seen as a leader of the New South or a captive to the worst of the Old Dixie.

The flag is Perdue's moment in history, and he ought to think about the generations of schoolchildren who will read about how he responded. If he wants to be remembered as a courageous leader, he must make sure that the Confederate battle symbol never flies over the state Capitol again.

He has that opportunity now with the GOP proposal to limit the flag referendum to a simple yes-or-no vote on a state flag resembling the one that flew before 1956. Outlined by Perdue's own floor leader Glenn Richardson on Thursday, that plan is far less inflammatory than Perdue's own perilous proposal.

Yet, there was a Perdue spokeswoman on Friday demonstrating that Perdue doesn't recognize a life preserver when one hits him on the head. "The governor," said Erin O'Brien, "is standing by his plan to put the 1956 flag on the ballot."

Dividing Georgia was the understood intent of the Legislature when it slapped the Rebel battle emblem on the Georgia flag in 1956. The vote represented an angry backlash to federally mandated desegregation. With their decree, lawmakers embraced the Confederate battle emblem as a symbol of support for segregation and white racial superiority.

At the opening of that racially charged session, Gov. Marvin Griffin announced, "All attempts to mix the races, whether they be in the classrooms, on the playgrounds, in public conveyances, in any other area of close contact, imperil the mores of the South."

The argument that the battle insignia was hoisted to commemorate Southern heritage, rather than segregation, is thoroughly discredited when you look at what else came out of the all-white Legislature in 1956. Its members passed laws making it a felony to teach at an integrated school, and state parks and bus stations became segregated for intrastate passengers. Police officers who refused to enforce segregation laws could lose all their retirement benefits.

As Zell Miller said, "They were prepared to eliminate our public schools and even prohibit our college football teams from competing in bowl games -- in order to maintain segregated schools, segregated public transportation, segregated drinking fountains and segregated recreational facilities."

All of those remnants of Georgia's segregationist past are gone, including the flag. Does Perdue want to be in the history books as the governor who brought back the emblem of slavery and segregation?

Perdue defeated Roy Barnes in part because he tapped into the resentment of rural whites who felt left behind by Georgia's march into the 21st century. He promised disaffected Georgians a vote on the state flag, and they intend to hold him to that misbegotten vow.

The diehard "flaggers" care more about the flag that flies over their children's school than the quality of education occurring inside. They will never be satisfied unless the Confederate battle emblem reigns once more.

An example is the Sons of Confederate Veterans chapter in Mableton, which embarrassed itself and its cause with its infantile and insulting treatment of state Rep. Alisha Thomas (D-Austell). When Thomas, an African-American freshman legislator, attended the Feb. 24 meeting, the members pledged allegiance to the 1956 Georgia flag, saluted Confederate battle flags and hooted and hollered to a member's rendition of "Dixie."

Thomas endured the Old South hootenanny and then stood up to explain that ". . . the symbol that you love is a symbol that for African-Americans is hateful and represents a dark past for our people." She left only after the chapter commander launched into an attack of the NAACP, for which Thomas had worked as a college student.

Clearly, these are not folks open to dialogue or compromise, and Perdue should give up any illusions of placating them. Instead, he should concentrate on the majority of Georgians, reasonable voters who don't want to revive the Confederacy but only want a say-so in the flag that flies over Georgia.

As the state's first Republican governor since Reconstruction, Perdue has already earned a mention in the history books. Surely he doesn't want those texts to associate him with a divisive and racially charged flag flap that set the state back decades.



Back to top   |   ajc.com home





TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: georgiaflag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-405 next last
To: justshutupandtakeit
The Scottish people won't claim to be a race.

Unless you can read minds, you are full of it. You have NOT even asked, so you would NOT know the answer.

There are only 4 races and Scot isn't one of them.

More of your politically correct BS, you should go back to the DU Forums where you belong.

341 posted on 03/21/2003 12:42:40 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
No need to ask. The Scots aren't stupid enough to believe the falsehoods you do.

Once again I ask you how many races there are. Don't say ONE, the human race, since you have already claimed there is a Southern race. Unless you are also claiming it isn't human.
342 posted on 03/21/2003 1:33:28 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit ( Its time to trap some RATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
No need to ask.

Because they would at the very least, laugh in your face at your statements.

The Scots aren't stupid enough to believe the falsehoods you do.

You're the one here shouting out falsehoods.

Once again I ask you how many races there are.

A lot, I am not sure how many.

Don't say ONE, the human race,

Don't you mean species.

since you have already claimed there is a Southern race. Unless you are also claiming it isn't human.

Oh so now you say Southerners AREN'T human. Face it, by your statements, you hate Southerners and that MAKES YOU a racist, live with it.

343 posted on 03/21/2003 1:53:51 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
You can't read at all can you?
344 posted on 03/21/2003 1:58:19 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit ( Its time to trap some RATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
You should ask yourself that question, considering you admit to only skimming other people's posts instead of actually reading them.
345 posted on 03/21/2003 2:14:51 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Race is a biological concept based on genetics. As opposed to the loopy Lysenkoism you are implicitly accepting.

Just as I said, your obsession.

Tell me - do you also obsess endlessly about other human attributes? Or is it just race you rant about...

346 posted on 03/21/2003 6:49:11 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
Your idiot friend brought up the absurdity of a "southern race" not me. It isn't my obsession. My denial of a patent absurdity gets me accused of having an "obsession."

What could be funnier than YOU accusing someone of having an obsession since apparently all you are interested in is justifying the traitorous actions of a bunch of whackos from 1860. LoL.

What do you think a "race" is? How many are there? How are they created?
347 posted on 03/24/2003 6:55:18 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit ( Its time to trap some RATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
How many lies do you want to spread about me? Every stupid word you posted to me was read to my great amusement I might add.
348 posted on 03/24/2003 6:57:20 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit ( Its time to trap some RATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
How many lies do you want to spread about me?

None, but your own narcissism won't allow you to admit that to yourself.

The only time I have talked about you is directly to you on this thread. I don't talk about people behind their backs. And my statements about you are based upon your own statements here on Free Republic.

349 posted on 03/24/2003 10:27:19 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
What do you think a "race" is? How many are there? How are they created?

Just as I said, you are obsessed with race. Do you also obsess over the determination of other human attributes?

350 posted on 03/24/2003 10:35:54 AM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
How do you get the idea that I am obsessed by race when I have merely been correcting idiotic ideas as to what it is? Am I obsessed with the Civil War because I respond to comments about that or the Founding Fathers because I respond to comments about them?

Is your idea of "obsession" as confused and false as your concept of "race?"

I don't even believe there is anything but one race any way.
Sub races are of no concern to me any more than blondes vs. black haired people or blue-eyed vs brown. Trying to make it appear that I am a racist is a losing endeavor but you seem to enjoy wasting your time so fire away.
351 posted on 03/24/2003 12:49:09 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit ( Its time to trap some RATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
No only do you lie that I am a racist but make up definitions to words attempting to prove your point.
352 posted on 03/24/2003 12:50:45 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit ( Its time to trap some RATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
You're the liar. I mean you're not even honest with yourself.
353 posted on 03/24/2003 4:26:02 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
How do you get the idea that I am obsessed by race

It's the subject of practically every post you've made on this thread.

354 posted on 03/24/2003 8:34:07 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
That is simply a lie.
355 posted on 03/25/2003 7:33:10 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit ( Its time to trap some RATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Who knows what "liar" and "honest" mean to you since you make up definitions as you go along.
356 posted on 03/25/2003 7:34:06 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit ( Its time to trap some RATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Who knows what "liar" and "honest" mean to you since you make up definitions as you go along.

I don't up anything, it you who refusees to be honest and actually read other people's post to you.

357 posted on 03/25/2003 11:41:09 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Who knows what "liar" and "honest" mean to you since you make up definitions as you go along.

I don't make up anything, it is you who refuses to be honest and actually read other people's post to you.

358 posted on 03/25/2003 11:41:35 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Your problem is that I do read your posts and recognize them as the drivel they are. You think you can just make up a definition such as "race" then say anything and when someone points out that your definition has nothing to do with reality you claim they are "racist." According to the rest of the world (the non-D.S world) a race is not what you claim nor is a racist what you claim.
359 posted on 03/25/2003 12:02:06 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit ( Its time to trap some RATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
You might find this informative.

Another Tennessean's view of the Confedrate Battle Flag.

360 posted on 03/25/2003 12:24:10 PM PST by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-405 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson