Group sues on behalf of child in Paper-Gun Incident

Rutherford Institute, Newark Star Ledger ^ | 03.05.03

[Coleus]

Group sues on behalf of child in paper Gun Incident

Irvington case reopens zero tolerance debate

Wednesday, March 05, 2003

BY KEVIN C. DILWORTH AND REGINALD ROBERTS
Star-Ledger Staff

The Rutherford Institute, a Virginia-based civil liberties organization, is taking a second New Jersey school district to court for what it sees as overzealous school officials overstepping their bounds in handling student conduct.

The institute filed a lawsuit against the Irvington Board of Education on behalf of one of two boys arrested nearly two years ago under the district's "zero tolerance" policy for playing with a paper gun.

The suit, filed last month in Superior Court in Newark, charges that Hamadi Alston, who was then 8 years old, was falsely arrested, maliciously prosecuted and had his rights of free speech violated. He and his classmate, Jaquill Shelton, were arrested by police March 15, 2001. Marc Shelton, Jaquill's father, has a pending lawsuit he filed against the school board in March 2002.

The Rutherford Institute filed a suit in 2000 on behalf of four Sayreville kindergartners who were suspended in a similar situation in which they were playing a schoolyard game of cops and robbers by pointing their fingers like guns.

The two Irvington boys, who were both second-graders at the Augusta Street School, threatened their classmates with a piece of notebook paper folded to resemble a gun, school officials said. Alston stood on a desk, pointing the paper gun at his classmates, saying "I'm going to kill you," they said.

The boys were taken to the principal's office, then arrested by police for making terroristic threats. They said they were merely playing a game of cops and robbers.

The arrests reopened a national debate on zero tolerance policies enacted by school boards following the Columbine High School shootings in Littleton, Colo., in 1999 in which two students killed 12 classmates and a teacher before committing suicide.

"The Irvington school district's zero tolerance policy was arbitrary and capricious," said Stephen Latimer, a Hackensack attorney hired by the Rutherford Institute to represent Alston. Also named in the suit are the police officers who arrested the boys, Superintendent of Schools Ernest Smith and other school officials involved in the incident, including the substitute teacher and acting school principal, who have since left the school.

School officials could not be reached for comment yesterday. But Ray Hamlin, whose law firm represents the school district, said he was not immediately aware of the lawsuit and that it had not been served to the district.

Latimer said the defendants should be notified of the lawsuit today.

Although Irvington Mayor Wayne Smith said he had not seen the suit, he said he would examine the role police played in the incident. The incident preceded his tenure in office, which began last July.

"I'm always interested in making sure that the police, or any other township employee, follow necessary procedures when it comes to carrying out what the law requires," the mayor said. "We will look at the ramifications of what took place and see if there's a need on our part to change any procedures."

But after the incident, school officials didn't see any need to change their procedures as they stood by their zero tolerance policy as a necessary evil of the times.

The Rutherford Institute, a national conservative, public-interest law firm, believes the policy is unnecessary.

"There was no crime here," said John Whitehead, president of the institute, which gained national attention for handling the Paula Jones' sexual harassment suit against President Clinton. "The kids had no clue of what they had done. No one was threatened. What can you do with a piece of paper?"

Latimer said the boys should have been simply told to stop playing with the paper gun. "Maybe they should have been taken to the principal's office, but I doubt even that."

Ron Alston, Hamadi's father, said the incident had put a strain on his family. "We got taken through a whole lot," he said, adding the incident forced him to place his son in private school. "This incident was so crazy. Somebody has to be a watchdog over these children. No way in the world should 8-year-olds have been arrested for playing with a piece of paper."

The Rutherford Institute has taken on numerous cases around the country involving school districts' zero tolerance policies.

Whitehead said many have been settled out of court like the Florida case in which a 15-year-old student was suspended from school for loaning a classmate a nail clipper. The clipper was considered a weapon under the school district's zero tolerance policy.

Last year, however, a federal judge dismissed the Sayreville lawsuit, saying school officials were in their right to suspend the kindergartners.

Whitehead, who said the Rutherford Institute has been a pioneer in filing these type of suits, said the Sayreville case has been appealed to the 3rd District Court of Appeals. "It may be headed to the Supreme Court."

http://www.nj.com/search/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1046848356199460.xml?starledger

http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=296

02/25/2003

Contact Info: Nisha N. Mohammed Ph: (434) 978-3888, ext. 604; Pager: 800-946-4646, Pin #: 1478257 Email: Nisha N. Mohammed

Rutherford Institute Attorneys File Complaint on Behalf of Third-Grader Arrested, Suspended Under School’s Zero Tolerance Policies

Attorneys Sue School and Police Department for False Arrest and Constitutional Violations

HACKENSACK, N.J. — Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute have filed suit in the Superior Court of New Jersey in Essex County on behalf of Hamadi Alston, a third-grader at Augusta Street School in Irvington, N.J., who was arrested for using an L-shaped piece of paper as a gun in a pretend game of “Cops and Robbers.” The complaint was filed against the Irvington Board of Education, its superintendent, the presiding principal of Augusta Street School at the time of the incident, Hamadi’s teacher, the school’s resource officer and the Irvington police officers who arrested Hamadi. The complaint makes charges of false arrest, malicious prosecution, violations of Hamadi’s free speech rights and the unconstitutional application of baseless zero tolerance policies.

On March 15, 2001, 8-year-old Hamadi and his classmates were directed to take advantage of the school’s “free time” period, during which students are permitted to speak among themselves, read books and play board games that are available in the classroom. When Hamadi and a fellow student selected a book to read, they found an L-shaped piece of paper contained within it. Using the L-shaped item as a paper gun and exclaiming “Pow, pow!” the boys began playing pretend games of “Cops and Robbers” and “Cowboys and Indians.” At no time did the boys threaten to harm each other or anyone else. At the conclusion of their “free time” period, the boys proceeded to their next class, at which point the school’s resource officer for interrogation removed the boys from the classroom and took them to the school office for questioning. At no time did school officials contact Hamadi’s parents. Upset by the interrogation, Hamadi began crying. When Hamadi’s father arrived to pick him up at the end of the day, he found his son crying in the office. When Irvington police officers arrived and asked Mr. Alston to transport his son to the police station, Alston refused. Police officers then arrested Hamadi and charged him with threatening to kill other students. Hamadi was held for 4½ hours before being released into his father’s custody; he was suspended from school for one day. After two court appearances, the criminal charges were dismissed by the prosecutor. Hamadi has since been treated for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The lawsuit contends that Hamadi suffered substantial emotional and mental injuries from being incarcerated and prosecuted without probable cause.

“One can only imagine the horror that Hamadi experienced when he was detained and arrested for playing a harmless childhood game,” stated John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute. “This lawsuit is intended to hold the defendants accountable for the considerable harm they inflicted upon this child and to validate the fact that even young children have a constitutional right not to be arrested and mistreated for engaging in harmless activity.”

The Rutherford Institute is an international, nonprofit civil liberties organization committed to defending constitutional and human rights.

[Coleus]

Fake gun lands costumed 6th grader In Montclair, NJ, a five-day suspension

[Liberal Classic]

My conspiratorial opinion along these lines is that they purposefully over-react to situations involving weaponry real or imagined, in order to teach the children to fear weapons of all types. When they grow up, they'll be more inclined to vote for a ban.

Zero tolerance was not an accident.

[Coleus]

Some Zero-Tolerance links on the FR

[Coleus]

Irvington NJ, is near Montclair/Upper Montclair NJ where the local chapter of Cease Fire exists, this area if very liberal and pro zero Tolerance.

http://www.anjrpc.org/Old_Stuff/montclair.htm

Yep, and Montcliar is the home of the Northern NJ Chapter of Cease Fire NJ.

http://www.ceasefirenj.org/cfessex.htm

http://www.ceasefirenj.org/march2001.htm#mn1
http://www.ceasefirenj.org/march2001.htm#mn2
http://www.ceasefirenj.org/march2001.htm#mn3
http://www.ceasefirenj.org/march2001.htm#mn4
http://www.ceasefirenj.org/march2001.htm#mn5
http://www.ceasefirenj.org/march2001.htm#mn6
http://www.ceasefirenj.org/march2001.htm#mn7

North Jersey Chapter
PO Box 43387 – Upper Montclair, New Jersey 07043
Tel: 973-744-3813 FAX: 973-655-1945
E-mail: Essex@CeaseFireNJ.org

[RWG]

Desensitization is a perspective that facilitates the rejection of responsibility, the core trait of psycopaths and leftists, not my fault, I'm a victim.

[xm177e2]

This makes me want to give Rutherford money. I think I will.

[Coleus]

Good Idea!

[frodolives]

Our 8 year old and his friends love "playing guns" in our yard. They well know the difference between play and the real thing, when Mom and Dad bring home a nice tasty buck.

But we, as parents, have sense enough to let them know it's not to be done at school. No pointing, no "bang", no "I'm gonna kill you!" at school. Lots of things you do at home can't be done at school, in public, at church, in a restaurant, or elsewhere. Even eight year olds get this, when parents take the time to explain.