[Dog Gone]

Yes, I was over at the Telegraph reading the original article.

I'm not sure what to think. I doubt this report is something the Administration wanted to leak, yet it's the logical conclusion of the Bush strategy at the UN. It does little good to prove the UN irrelevant, yet pretend afterward that it is by continuing business as usual.

But, it's not something that would be a good thing to reveal publicly before the vote. Privately, perhaps. Not publicly.

[nononsense]

we must destroy united nations building after it is evicted from U.S soil. this building is full of evil socialist thoughts that could contaminate anyone who steps into doors.

[ewing]

It would give us leverage on the position of going it alone with the UK. (if they would do the same, or couse)

[Nita Nuprez]

I have $100 that says when Bill Clinton hears this rumor, he lets loose a long string of four-letter words that would make Hillary's "FJB" comment look like a Sunday school lesson. I'd give anything if I could see his face. ROTFLOL!

[Jeff Chandler]

. I doubt this report is something the Administration wanted to leak

Of course it is. This was "leaked" to "encourage" the Security Council members to vote yes. Bush is playing hardball. Wish he would play like that with the rats.

[Tuscaloosa Goldfinch]

Somehow, as much as I would like to see the UN GONE!, I think this could be a bluff in a poker game. Wonder how fast the rest of the Security Council will fold when they know GW's holding a royal flush?