Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Franking
No wonder the Networks turned this down. Last week, when W asked for live coverage of a bland policy speech at AEI, the networks were pretty peeved there wasn't more substance.

Uh, you mean the one where he talked about the future shape of the Middle East?

87 posted on 03/06/2003 4:29:20 PM PST by Interesting Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Interesting Times; Franking
Did the networks turn him down?
96 posted on 03/06/2003 4:30:31 PM PST by Howlin (It's another good day to be a Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: Interesting Times
>>Uh, you mean the one where he talked about the future shape of the Middle East?

Yes, that one. Whomever was stage managing at the WH was pretty heavy handed demanding airtime, so the scuttlebutt goes, and it came across like an attempt at anti-anti-war-protest spin.

That speech was "newspaper important", not "TV important" in the minds of the networks. Better suited to op-eds and column-4 pieces in the dailies that taking up vital, expensive TV time.

Plus, these was no cool visual, nothing exploding, no celebrities, no crowds, no good "No Blood For Oil!" sound bites. Nothing that could be summarized in <5 seconds. Too much to think about.

F
123 posted on 03/06/2003 4:36:38 PM PST by Franking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson