[churchillbuff]

You didn't listen to his answer.

What was his answer? all he said is that North Korea is a regional issue, to be handled multilaterally? But he didn't explain why that should be so with North Korea, but not with Iraq.

[NittanyLion]

What was his answer? all he said is that North Korea is a regional issue, to be handled multilaterally? But he didn't explain why that should be so with North Korea, but not with Iraq.

Iraq presents an immediate threat by way of terrorist attacks; North Korea presents a longer-term threat that will have to be dealt with, but all in good time...

[dep]

all he said is that North Korea is a regional issue, to be handled multilaterally? But he didn't explain why that should be so with North Korea, but not with Iraq.

you might have slept through it, but on september 11, 2001, a bunch of diaperheads destroyed the world trade center and did considerable damage to the pentagon and were responsible for the destruction of four of our airliners, killing all aboard. this makes belligerent diaperheads out problem. beligerent n.k. nutjobs are everybody's problem, but the cowards at the u.n. refuse to admit it.

got it now?

dep

[floriduh voter]

For what it's worth, NK is developing nukes but saddam already has bio weapons, ties to bin laden and probably already has suitcase nukes.

Dubya cannot tell all because it's classified - that's probably hard to do but would explain why he seemed so reluctant to discuss details. Our government probably doesn't want saddam to know how much we know.