[NittanyLion]

What was his answer? all he said is that North Korea is a regional issue, to be handled multilaterally? But he didn't explain why that should be so with North Korea, but not with Iraq.

Iraq presents an immediate threat by way of terrorist attacks; North Korea presents a longer-term threat that will have to be dealt with, but all in good time...

[goodnesswins]

The risk of doing nothing or that saddam changes his mind and becomes a gentle soul.....is not a risk I am not willing to take for the American people....

Now, John King...fixation with saddam hussein (as said by ted kennedy?).....costs, risks....shut up john....

President ....My job is to protect America and that's what I am going to do...and people can describe all kinds of intentions....saddam is a threat....and i've got good evidence to believe that....he's used WMD on his own people, and invaded countries, tortures his own people, murderer....trained and financed Al Quaid and other terrorist organizations...I take the threat seriously....the rest of your 6 point question....

The price of doing nothing exceeds the price of taking action if we have to....!!!!!!!!!!!!

The price of the attacks on America on 9-11 were enormous, significant, and I'm not willing to take that chance again