Skip to comments.
Kyodo News: USA Is Warning of Possible Launch of NODONG Missile By North Korea (7:20 pm Eastern)
Kyodo News Service (From Original Japanese, by "Freepranslation") ^
| 6 March 2003 Japan Time
| Kyodo News (in Japanese)
Posted on 03/05/2003 5:29:04 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo
7:20 p.m. Eastern Time, Wednesday Nite
By ticker, with specific news to follow. Ticker: "USA Warns of Possible Nodong Missile Test Launch by North Korea" ("Kita chosen no missairu no nodong shisha wo keikai, bei seifu")
It is unclear who was warned but most certainly must be Japan and South Korea. It does not say when the Nodong test launch may occur. Other interpretations of the operational verb are: "on guard against, worried, warning, keeping an eye on."
Just appeared briefly and is still up on the Japanese Kyodo website (link above). More details should come in soon. It might point to an expected launch of a Nodong, rather than a Taepodong, from the DPRK in a short period of time from now.
Defense spokesman for Japan Ishiba and others stated yesterday that the DPRK Nodong missile is capable of being retrofitted with a nuclear warhead.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crisis; dprk; japan; launch; missile; nodong; northkorea; provocations; seaofjapan; tension
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: AmericanInTokyo
Do you have any idea if they would make this a test over japan?
21
posted on
03/05/2003 5:43:34 PM PST
by
duk
To: Poohbah
They need a better name the "No Dong."Yeah, I'd be more concerned if it was the "Long Dong".
To: Poohbah
In North Korean, "No Dong" means worker, laborer, proletarian, whatever. Though it would make a good brand name for North Korean condoms...
23
posted on
03/05/2003 5:45:51 PM PST
by
JackelopeBreeder
("Push to test." <Click!> "Release to detonate." Oops...)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Does the average Japanese in the street seem to be aware of this danger? How is it affecting Tokyo's view point toward self-defense? I have note recently that there is talk of a nuclear arms race in the region, but is that simply speculation, or are major players in the government giving thought to that?
24
posted on
03/05/2003 5:45:52 PM PST
by
twntaipan
(Defend American Liberty: Defeat a demoncRAT!)
To: Semper Paratus
I think we have the "long dong" so they better keep theirs where it belongs or they are toast. : )
To: AmericanInTokyo
Thanks and keep the updates comming. Are you actually in Japan?
Isn't this quite a shock to the Japanese?
26
posted on
03/05/2003 5:47:43 PM PST
by
Milwaukee_Guy
(Having France in NATO, is like taking an accordion deer hunting.......)
To: AmericanInTokyo
27
posted on
03/05/2003 5:48:55 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: jimmyBEEgood
if they nuke our troops in Japan & SK If they do, they would also begin to rush the border and start firing with everything else they have, because whether they do or not they would be about to lose everything.
28
posted on
03/05/2003 5:49:04 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
To: Shermy
I think the information about the "warhead" supposedly found in Alaska began as Japanese verbal info, translated into Korean, and then into English.
I have a feeling that it actually was talking about something landing NEAR Alaska and got horribly screwed up along the way.
29
posted on
03/05/2003 5:51:53 PM PST
by
John H K
To: Milwaukee_Guy
Thanks and keep the updates coming. Are you actually in Japan? Thanks. I enjoy contributing to FR. But frankly, I won't keep them coming if I have to research and translate from a foreign language and then post, for the benefit of the readership, and then have some people come on with foolish jokes and basically ruin the thread and our research and discussion. To me, this issue is not a joke. Anyone else agree?
Thanks MG (and also backhoe, duk, JBg and some others who I'll freepmail). Bye.
30
posted on
03/05/2003 5:52:56 PM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(Easy to UNDERRATE N.Korea: Idiotic leader, starving people. BUT DON'T! They could attack in a flash.)
To: Poohbah
If Ill keeps it up, he'll end up like the missles name sake.
31
posted on
03/05/2003 5:53:41 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
So if Tokyo goes POOF that ought to get our attention. Been seeing a whole lot of ads on TV lately paid for by the Japanese govt. to remind Americans that they are stalwart friends.
Makes me wonder what this ad campaign is really all about. Maybe a case of "do not desert me, oh my darlin."
Could be that N. Korea is coordinating its missile launch with our attack on Baghdad. If the Israelis are right, it will be Sunday.
32
posted on
03/05/2003 5:55:11 PM PST
by
Naomi4
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: Poohbah
They need a better name the "No Dong."That's about right! - "No Dong" translated into French as "La Pecker Free"
34
posted on
03/05/2003 5:58:25 PM PST
by
Jambe
To: RightWhale
IMHO the most problematic thing with NK is their huge standing army which is as much or more of a threat than any nuclear capability they have.
Our nukes should provide a deterent against their nukes but they have us outgunned on the ground. Not much we can do if the NK army pour over the border.
35
posted on
03/05/2003 5:59:50 PM PST
by
Milwaukee_Guy
(Having France in NATO, is like taking an accordion deer hunting.......)
To: AmericanInTokyo
To me, this issue is not a joke. Anyone else agree? Agreed, and your valuable contributions so noted. Please continue your reports and analysis. For many of us, you are the sole resource in that part of the world providing us with this critical information. Thanks again.
36
posted on
03/05/2003 6:00:17 PM PST
by
steve86
(O.J. did it.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
The message is to North Korea...... We're watching you!!
37
posted on
03/05/2003 6:00:59 PM PST
by
bert
(Don't Panic !)
To: Poohbah
Better name would be "No Dung" Then they can sell it to soddom!
38
posted on
03/05/2003 6:01:19 PM PST
by
US_MilitaryRules
(A penny saved is a governmental oversite!!!)
To: BearWash; AmericanInTokyo
Yes, I agree. Please keep 'em coming, Gaijin!
To: jimmyBEEgood
I just don't think we could use nukes there A nuke needn't necessarily generate a lot of fallout. There would be a suitable target or two, nukes optional. But general nuking of the terrain wouldn't be required.
40
posted on
03/05/2003 6:03:24 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson